Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer of Moderna Inc. explained in a 2017 TED talk how the company’s mRNA vaccine is designed to work. Over the last 30 years, he said, “we’ve had this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you that we’re actually hacking the software of life, and it’s changing the way we think about disease prevention and treatment.”
Hacking the software of life
He went on to explain [see video below] that the human body is made up of organs and organs are made up of cells.
In every cell, there’s this thing called messenger RNA, or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made of. That’s the critical information that determines what the cell is going to do. So we think of it as an operating system.
“So if you could change that, if you could introduce or change one line of code, it turns out to have profound effects on everything from the flu to cancer.”
I reported on February 4 that Moderna describes its new vaccine as “a computer operating system,” but I wasn’t aware at the time that Zaks had already talked about it three years ago and completely debunked the Establishment media’s lie that mRNA vaccines don’t alter the genetic code.
He couldn’t have been clearer when he said, “We’re actually hacking the software of life.”
Zaks emphasized that in 2017, his company is working on a vaccine that doesn’t behave like any other vaccine ever developed.
“Imagine instead of giving [the patient] the protein of a virus, we give them the instructions on how to make the protein, how the body can make its own vaccine,” he said.
Zaks said it took decades to sequence the human genome, which was accomplished in 2003, “and now we can do it in a week.”
He went on to reveal his company’s plans in 2017 to make custom cancer vaccines tailored to the needs of individual cancer patients “because every cancer is different.”
Interestingly, one of the most potentially disastrous side effects of the mRNA vaccine is its interaction with cancer cells. According to a study at the Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, mRNA has a tendency to inactivate tumor-suppressing proteins, which means it can promote the growth of cancer cells.
Both the Moderna and Pfizer injections are experimental mRNA vaccines. The FDA has only given these injections an Emergency Use Authorization [EUA] and they will remain in testing until 2023, yet they are promoted by the government, media, and companies as if they are guaranteed safe.
This systemic deception will, in my opinion, end up being judged in the rearview mirror of history as one of the most reckless acts of medical treason ever committed against the human race.
If this so-called vaccine actually causes more people to get cancer, think of the possibilities from a purely business standpoint.
Based on the predictions of Dr. Zaks, who oversaw the development of the vaccine now being given to millions of people worldwide, the same Big Pharma companies that potentially give cancer to people with one vaccine could later appear with another vaccine offering the cure for cancer. If you’re the CEO of a mega-pharmaceutical company that obeys Wall Street’s profit-seeking shareholders, that’s a brilliant strategy!
Is that ethical?
But is it ethical from a medical point of view? That is a question that no one asks.
As I listen to Dr. Zaks laying out his company’s accomplishments in developing the mRNA vaccine, I can’t help but think how incredibly arrogant that sounds. For scientists to think they can rewrite the genetic code [his words, not mine] , for all of you out there who still don’t believe these mRNA vaccines change the genetic code just because some “fact checker” says they don’t, to think they can improve a person’s genetic heritage is a dangerous endeavor. Who’s to say they won’t correct a problem and create something much worse?
Zaks ended his 2017 speech with the following words:
“If you think about what we’re trying to do: We’ve taken information and our understanding of that information and how that information is transmitted in a cell, and we’ve taken our understanding of medicine and how to make drugs, and we’re merging the two. We call that information therapy.”
Just like a computer software code. These scientists really believe that the human body is nothing more than a machine that can be hacked into and rearranged according to the instructions of a programmer.
The same groundbreaking nature of this research that excites some is what horrifies others.
A person’s genetic heritage is, as Dr. Zak said, “the software of life.”
If this is true, then who should be the ultimate authority on each person’s genetic software code? If we truly live in a free society, wouldn’t it stand to reason that we would want to have a vigorous debate about how to answer this question? Shouldn’t it be the number one issue being debated in Congress and in the media? Instead, no one is allowed to even ask these questions without being threatened, censored, rebuked, deplatformed. Members of the corporate media who dare to raise the issue are fired.
Contrary to what some scientists believe, we are not machines. We are human beings with bodies, souls and free will. Anyone who tries to force acceptance of experimental gene-modifying treatment is in violation of the international Nuremberg Codes, which require informed consent for any experimental treatment.
Dear Reader: Please do not allow your employer, your government, your family, your friends, or anyone else to intimidate you or in any way try to persuade you to accept this experimental treatment if you do not want it. You are your own health authority, end of story. If your employer threatens to fire you for refusing this injection, please contact an attorney.