Ковид и вакцинация: Что нужно знать наизусть, чтобы уверенно спорить?


We get a lot of emails and private messages asking, “do you have such and such a source?” or “can you point me to studies on masks?” or “I know I saw a graph on mortality, but I can’t find it anymore.” It’s been a long 18 months and there are so many statistics and numbers to try to keep track of.

The most Important Facts and Sources

So, in order to keep up with all of these inquiries, we decided to list by point and source all of the key points.

Here are the main facts and sources about the so-called “pandemic” that will help you understand what has happened in the world since January 2020, and enlighten any of your friends who might still be caught in the fog of the new normal.

Faced with fake news and the globalists’ authorized “conspiracy theories”: cognitive self-defense!

Plan of the file :

PART I: “COVID DEATHS” & MORTALITY

1. The survival rate of “Covid” is over 99%.

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality.

3. The number of “Covid deaths” is artificially inflated.

4. The vast majority of Covid deaths have serious comorbidities.

5. The average age of “Covid death” is higher than the average life expectancy.

6. Covid mortality accurately reflects the natural mortality curve.

7. The massive increase in “illegal” DNR orders.

PART II: LOCKOUTS

8. Lockdowns do not prevent the spread of disease.

9. Lockdowns kill people.

10. Hospitals have never been abnormally overcrowded.

PART III: PCR TESTING

11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose disease.

12. PCR tests have always been inaccurate and unreliable.

13. Ct (cycle threshold) values for PCR tests are too high.

14. PCR tests accepted by the World Health Organization have produced false positives.

15. The scientific basis of Covid tests is questionable.

PART IV: “ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION

16. The majority of Covid infections are “asymptomatic”.

17. There is very little evidence to support the alleged danger of “asymptomatic transmission”.

PART V: VENTILATORS

18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses.

19. Ventilators have killed people.

PART VI: MASKS

20. Masks do not work.

21. Masks are bad for your health.

22. Masks are bad for the planet.

PART VII: VACCINES

23. Covid “vaccines” are totally unheard of.

24. Vaccines do not confer immunity and do not prevent transmission.

25. The vaccines have been precipitated and have unknown long-term effects.

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal immunity from harm.

PART VIII: DECEPTION AND FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The EU was preparing “vaccine passports” at least a YEAR before the pandemic began.

28. A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic only weeks before it began.

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the flu has “disappeared”.

30. The financial elite made a fortune during the pandemic.

“Covid Deaths” & Mortality

1. The survival rate of “Covid” is over 99%.

Official medical experts have emphasized, from the beginning of the pandemic, that the vast majority of the population is in no danger from Covid.


Almost all studies on the infection-to-lethality ratio of Covid have reported results between 0.04% and 0.5%. This means that the survival rate of Covid is at least 99.5%.

2. There was NO unusual excess mortality.

The press called 2020 “the deadliest year in the UK since World War II”, but this is misleading because it ignores the massive increase in population since that time. A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR):

By this measure, 2020 is not even the worst mortality year since 2000. In fact, since 1943, only 9 years have been better than 2020.

Similarly, in the United States, the age-standardized death rate for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

The increases in mortality we observed could be due to non-Covid related cases.

3. The number of “Covid deaths” is artificially inflated.

Countries around the world have defined a “Covid death” as “death from any cause within 28/30/60 days of a positive test.”

Health officials from Italy, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, Northern Ireland and others have all admitted to the practice:



Removing any distinction between dying of Covid and dying of something else after testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to an overcount of “Covid deaths.” British pathologist Dr. John Lee warned of this “substantial overcount” as early as last spring. Other mainstream sources have also reported it.



Given the huge percentage of “asymptomatic” Covid infections, the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities, and the potential for false positive tests, this makes the number of Covid deaths an extremely unreliable statistic.

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have severe comorbidities.

In March 2020, the Italian government released statistics showing that 99.2% of their “Covid deaths” had at least one serious comorbidity. These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, kidney failure and diabetes (among others). More than 50% had three or more serious pre-existing conditions.

This trend continued in all other countries during the “pandemic.” An October 2020 FOIA request to the UK ONS found that less than 10% of the official number of “Covid deaths” at that time had Covid as the sole cause of death.



5. The average age of “Covid death” is higher than the average life expectancy.

The average age of a “Covid death” in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italy, it is 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. United States, 78. Australia, 82. In almost every case, the median age of a “Covid death” is higher than the national life expectancy.

As such, for most of the world, the “pandemic” had little or no impact on life expectancy. Compare that to the Spanish flu, which caused a 28% drop in life expectancy in the United States in just over a year.



6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality curve.

Statistical studies from the United Kingdom and India have shown that the “Covid death” curve follows almost exactly the expected mortality curve:

The “Covid” risk of death follows, almost exactly, your overall risk of death. Читай здесь.

The small increase for some of the older age groups may be explained by other factors.



7. The massive increase in “illegal” DNR orders.

Watchdogs and government agencies have reported a dramatic increase in the use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the past 20 months. In the United States, hospitals routinely considered DNRs for any patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblower nurses admitted that the DNR system had been abused in New York.

In the UK there was an “unprecedented” rise in “illegal” DNRs for people with disabilities, general practices sent letters to non-terminally ill patients recommending that they sign DNR orders, while other doctors signed “cover DNRs” for entire nursing homes.

A study by the University of Sheffield found that more than one-third of all “suspect” Covid patients had a DNR attached to their chart within 24 hours of hospital admission. Widespread use of forced or illegal DNR orders could explain any increase in mortality in 2020/21.


Locks

8. Lockdowns do not prevent the spread of disease.

There is little or no evidence that lockdowns have any impact on limiting “Covid deaths.” If you compare confined areas to unconfined areas, you can’t see any trends. Читай здесь.

“Covid deaths” in Florida (no lockdown) versus California (lockdown).
“Covid deaths” in Sweden (no lock-in) vs. UK (lock-in).

9. Lockdowns kill people.

There is strong evidence that lockdowns – through social, economic and other public health damage – are more deadly than the “virus.” Читай здесь.

Dr. David Nabarro, the World Health Organization’s special envoy for Covid-19, called the closures a “global catastrophe” in October 2020:

“We at the World Health Organization do not advocate containment as the primary means of controlling the virus…it appears that global poverty could double by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, horrible global catastrophe.”

An April 2020 U.N. report warned of 100,000 children killed by the economic impact of the shutdowns, while tens of millions more face poverty and starvation. Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other social mental health crises are increasing around the world. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings will lead to increased mortality from heart disease and cancer in the near future. Читай здесь.

The impact of confinement would explain the small increases in excess mortality.



10. Hospitals have never been abnormally overcrowded

the main argument used to defend lockdowns is that “flattening the curve” would prevent a rapid influx of cases and protect health systems from collapse. But most health systems were never on the verge of collapse.

In March 2020, it was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italy were overflowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017, Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity and in 2015 patients were sleeping in hallways. A March 2020 JAMA article revealed that Italian hospitals “typically operate at 85-90% capacity during the winter months.”



In the UK, the NHS is routinely stretched to the breaking point during the winter.

As part of its Covid policy, the NHS announced in the spring of 2020 that it would “reorganize hospital capacity in new ways to treat Covid and non-Covid patients separately” and that “as a result, hospitals will experience capacity pressures at a lower overall occupancy level than before.”

That means they cut thousands of beds. During a supposedly deadly pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu season and sometimes actually had 4 times as many empty beds as normal.

In the UK and US, millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were never used.


PCR Tests

11. PCR Tests were not designed to diagnose Disease.

The Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the “Gold Standard” for diagnosing Covid. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended to use it as a diagnostic tool, and has stated publicly:

“PCR is just a process that allows you to make a lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick or that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.” Читай здесь.

12. PCR Tests have always been Inaccurate and Unreliable.

The “Gold Standard” PCR tests for Covid are known to produce many false positive results, by reacting to DNA material that is not specific to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese study found that the same patient could get two different results for the same test on the same day. In Germany, tests have been known to react to cold viruses. A 2006 study found that PCR tests for one virus also responded to other viruses. In 2007, the use of PCR tests led to a whooping cough “epidemic” that never really existed. Some tests in the United States even responded to the negative control sample.



The late president of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted goat, papaya and motor oil samples for PCR testing, all of which came back positive for the virus.

By February 2020, experts admitted that the test was unreliable. Dr. Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, told Chinese state television, “The accuracy of the tests is only 30 to 50 percent.” The Australian government’s website stated that “there is limited evidence to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.” And a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests are “unreliable” and should not be used for diagnosis. Читать здесь and here.


13. Ct Values (cycle threshold) of PCR Tests are too High.

PCR tests are run in cycles, the number of cycles you use to get your result is known as the “cycle threshold” or CT value. Kary Mullis said, “If you have to run more than 40 cycles…there’s something really wrong with your PCR.”

The MIQE PCR guidelines agree, stating, “CT] values above 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and should generally not be reported,” with Dr. Fauci himself even admitting that anything above 35 cycles is almost never culturable. (See Attachment 1 at the end)

Dr. Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times, “Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive…I’m shocked that people think 40 [cycles] might represent a positive result…A more reasonable threshold would be 30 to 35.”


In the same article, Dr. Michael Mina of the Harvard School of Public Health stated that the limit should be 30, and the author goes on to point out that reducing the TC from 40 to 30 would have reduced “covid cases” in some states by as much as 90%.

The CDC’s own data suggest that no sample in 33 cycles could be cultured, and the German Robert Koch Institute says that nothing in 30 cycles is likely to be infectious.

Despite this, it is known that almost all laboratories in the United States perform their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as many as 45. The NHS “standard operating procedure” for PCR testing rules sets the limit at 40 cycles. Based on what we know about CT values, the majority of PCR test results are questionable at best. (See Attachment 2 at the End) Читай здесь.

14. PCR Tests admitted by the World Health Organization have produced False Positives.

In December 2020, the WHO issued an information note on the PCR process asking laboratories to be wary of high CT values causing false positive results:

“When samples return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect the virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to make.” Читай здесь.

Then, in January 2021, WHO issued another memo, this time warning that “asymptomatic” positive PCR tests should be retested because they could be false positives:

“When test results do not match the clinical presentation, a new sample should be collected and retested using the same or different NAT technology.”

15. The scientific basis for Covid testing is questionable.

The Sars-Cov-2 virus genome was reportedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in December 2019 and published on January 10, 2020. Less than two weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) reportedly used the genome to create assays for PCR testing.

They wrote a paper, Detection of New Coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) by Real-Time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on January 21, 2020, and accepted on January 22. This means that the paper would have been “peer reviewed” in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks. Читай здесь.

Since then, a consortium of more than forty life scientists has called for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper’s methodology. Читай здесь.

They also requested the publication of the journal’s peer review report, to prove that the article actually went through the peer review process. The journal has yet to comply. The Corman-Drosten tests are the basis for all Covid PCR tests in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.

Asympthomatic Infection

16. The majority of Covid Infections are “Asymptomatic.”

As early as March 2020, studies in Italy suggested that 50-75% of positive Covid tests were asymptomatic. Another UK study in August 2020 found that 86% of “Covid patients” had no viral symptoms. Читай здесь.

It is literally impossible to tell the difference between an “asymptomatic case” and a false positive test result.

17. There is very little Evidence to Support the alleged Danger of “Asymptomatic Transmission”.

In June 2020, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s Emerging Diseases and Zoonoses Unit, stated:

“From the data we have, it still seems rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits to a secondary individual.”

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that asymptomatic carriers had less than a 1% chance of infecting people in their household. Another study, conducted on influenza in 2009, found:

“…limited evidence to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic] transmission. The role of asymptomatic or presymptomatic influenza-infected persons in disease transmission may have been overstated….”

Given the known defects in PCR testing, many “asymptomatic cases” may be false positives.


Ventilators

18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory Viruses. Mechanical ventilation is not, and never has been, a recommended treatment for Respiratory Infections of any kind. Early in the Pandemic, many Physicians came forward to Question the use of Ventilators to treat “Covid.”

Writing in The Spectator, Dr. Matt Strauss stated:

“Ventilators don’t cure any disease. They can fill your lungs with air when you find yourself unable to do so yourself. They are associated with lung disease in the public consciousness, but that is not in fact their most common or appropriate application.”

German pulmonologist Dr. Thomas Voshaar, president of the Association of Pneumatological Clinics said:

“When we read the first studies and reports from China and Italy, we immediately wondered why intubation was so common there. It contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.”

Despite this, the WHO, CDC (USA), ECDC (EU) and NHS (UK) all “recommended” ventilating Covid patients instead of using non-invasive methods. This was not a medical policy designed to best treat patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets. Читай здесь. Читай здесь. (See Attachments 3 and 4 at the End.)

19. Ventilators have killed People.

Putting someone with influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or any other condition that restricts breathing or affects the lungs on a ventilator will not alleviate any of these symptoms. In fact, it will almost certainly make the situation worse and kill many.

Intubation tubes are a potential source of infection known as “ventilator-associated pneumonia,” which studies show affects up to 28 percent of all people on ventilators and kills 20 to 55 percent of those infected. Читай здесь. Читай здесь.

Mechanical ventilation also damages the physical structure of the lungs, resulting in “ventilator-induced lung injury,” which can have a significant impact on quality of life and even lead to death. Читай здесь.

Experts estimate that 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their disease. Worldwide, between 66 and 86 percent of all “Covid patients” put on ventilators have died. Читай здесь. Читай здесь.

According to this “plainclothes nurse,” the ventilators were so badly used in New York that they were destroying patients’ lungs:


This policy was at best negligence, and at worst potentially deliberate murder. This misuse of ventilators could explain any increase in mortality in 2020/21.

Маски

20. Masks don’t Work.

At least a dozen scientific studies have shown that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses. A meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found “no significant reduction in flu transmission with the use of face masks.” Another study of more than 8,000 subjects found that masks “did not appear to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections or clinical respiratory infections.” Read a summary by SPR.



While some studies have been done claiming to show that masks work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys as data. Another was so poorly designed that an expert panel is calling for its removal. A third was withdrawn after its predictions were found to be totally inaccurate. Читай здесь.



The WHO commissioned its own meta-analysis in the Lancet, but that study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. Aside from the scientific evidence, there is plenty of hard evidence that masks do nothing to stop the spread of disease.


For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had nearly identical case numbers, although one had a mask mandate and the other did not. Читай здесь.

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid “cases” than counties with mask mandates. And while masks are very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.



21. Masks are bad for your Health.

Wearing a mask for long periods of time, wearing the same mask more than once, and other aspects of cloth masks can be bad for your health. A lengthy study on the harmful effects of mask wearing was recently published by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. (See Appendix 5 at the End)

Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 that he observed an increase in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections and facial rashes. Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and can be potentially carcinogenic. Читай здесь.


Children wearing masks encourage mouth breathing, which leads to facial deformities. Around the world, people have fainted from CO2 poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in China have even suffered sudden cardiac arrest. Читай здесь.



22. Masks are bad for the Planet.

Millions upon millions of disposable masks have been used per month for over a year. A UN report found that the Covid-19 pandemic will likely lead to a doubling of plastic waste in the next few years, and the vast majority of these are face masks.



The report goes on to warn that these masks (and other medical waste) will clog sewage and irrigation systems, adversely affecting public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A Swansea University study found that “heavy metals and plastic fibers were released when disposable masks were immersed in water. These materials are toxic to humans and wildlife.


Вакцины

23. Covid “Vaccines” are completely Novel.

Before 2020, no effective vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been developed. Since then, we would have made 20 in 18 months. Читай здесь.

Scientists have been trying to develop a vaccine against SARS and MERS for years with little success. Some of the SARS vaccines that have failed have actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. This means that vaccinated mice could potentially contract the disease “more severely” than unvaccinated mice. Another attempt caused liver damage in ferrets.



While traditional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened strain of the disease-causing microorganism, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines. Читай здесь.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by injecting viral mRNA into the body, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your body to recognize and make antigens for the virus’ “spike proteins.” They have been researched since the 1990s, but prior to 2020, no mRNA vaccine had ever been approved.


24. Vaccines do not confer Immunity and do not prevent Transmission.

It is recognized that Covid “vaccines” do not confer immunity to infection and do not prevent you from transmitting the disease to others. Indeed, an article in the British Medical Journal pointed out that vaccine studies were not even designed to try to assess whether the “vaccines” limited transmission. Читай здесь.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, when untested mRNA gene therapies were released, made it clear that the “efficacy” of their product was based on “reducing the severity of symptoms.” Читай здесь.

25. Vaccines have been Rushed and have Unknown long-term Effects.

Vaccine development is a slow and laborious process. Usually, from development to testing and finally to approval for public use, it takes many years. The various Covid vaccines were all developed and approved in less than a year. Obviously, there can be no long-term safety data on chemicals that are less than a year old.


Pfizer even admits that this is true in the leaked supply contract between the pharmaceutical giant and the Albanian government:

“The long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known.” Читай здесь.

In addition, none of the vaccines have been properly tested. Many have ignored early-stage trials altogether, and late-stage human trials have not been peer-reviewed, have not published their data, will not be completed until 2023, or have been abandoned after “serious adverse events.” Читай здесь.



26. Vaccine Manufacturers have been Granted Legal Immunity from Harm.

The U.S. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) grants immunity until at least 2024. The EU’s product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU has signed with vaccine manufacturers. Читай здесь.



The UK has gone even further, providing permanent legal indemnity to the government, and its employees, for any harm caused when a patient is treated for Covid-19 or “suspected Covid-19.” Again, the disclosed Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer has made this indemnity a standard demand for the supply of Covid vaccines:

“Buyer hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Pfizer […] harmless from any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses.” Читай здесь.

Deception and Foreknowledge

27. The EU was preparing “Vaccine Passports” at least a YEAR before the Pandemic began.

The proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency measures, have been in existence since before the disease emerged. Читай здесь.

Two EU documents published in 2018, the “2018 State of Vaccine Confidence” and a technical report titled “Design and Implementation of a Vaccine Information System,” discussed the plausibility of an EU-wide vaccination surveillance system. These documents were consolidated into the 2019 “Vaccine Roadmap,” which established (among other things) a “feasibility study” on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and end in 2021:

The final findings of this report were released in September 2019, just one month before the 201 event. (See Appendices 6, 7 and 8 at the End).

28. A “Training Exercise” predicted the Pandemic just Weeks before it began.

In October 2019, the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University hosted Event 201. It was a training exercise based on a zoonotic coronavirus triggering a global pandemic. The exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the GAVI vaccine alliance.


The exercise released its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a “call to action.” A month later, China recorded its first “Covid” case. (See Appendix 9 at the End).

29. Since the beginning of 2020, Meanwhile, Influenza has “Disappeared.”

In the United States, for example, since February 2020, flu cases have reportedly declined by more than 98%.

It’s not just in the U.S. that the global flu has apparently almost completely disappeared. Meanwhile, a new disease called “Covid,” which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality rate to the flu, is apparently affecting everyone normally affected by the flu.



30. The Financial Elite made a Fortune during the Pandemic.

Since containment began, the wealthiest people have become considerably richer. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created “fighting the coronavirus,” 9 of whom are vaccine manufacturers. Читай здесь.

Business Insider reported that “billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars” in October 2020. Clearly, that number needs to be even larger now.



These are the key facts about the pandemic to remember. They are presented here to help you formulate and support your discussions with family, friends and strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who have gathered and collected this information over the past 20 months, especially Swiss Policy Research. Читай здесь.

Вложения

1. The MIQE Guidelines


2. Guidance and Standard Operating Procedure COVID-19


3. Infection Prevention and Control


4. Clinical Management of Persons admitted to Hospital


5. Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?


6. Designing and implementing an Immunisation Information System


7. Roadmap for the Implementation of Actions by the European Commission


8. Public Private Pandemic Call to Action


9. State of Vaccine Confidence in the EU 2018