Geven Britse wetenschappers toe dat zij angst op onethische en totalitaire wijze gebruiken in hun reactie op Covid?

Concept van angst voor coronavirus. De vrouw behandelt haar gezicht haar handen op achtergrond met coronavirus.

If UK Scientists admit to unethical and totalitarian use of fear in Covid response – What else are they using against us?

It is very tempting to want to believe that the response to covid is rooted in altruism, logic, cool-headedness and reason. After all, who wants to believe that they are being manipulated?

Social Engineering

For almost a decade I’ve been publishing articles on the reality that psychology and psychiatry are being exploited on a mass scale to encourage social changes. Personally, I think the best term for this is social engineering, because I like what engineers do.

Engineers design complex systems for specific purposes to withstand specific stressors. That’s what this is. A complex social system designed to manufacture consent for a world governed by increasingly inhumane and controlling. To survive it must maintain a base level of public support. It must be able to withstand the stress of any social movements which threaten this order.

It’s not very cosmic, I know. What’s cosmic is realizing that we’ve all incarnated here on earth at this moment in time to deal with it. But that’s another story.

Now, I have three kids and I can’t get them to agree on what flavor of ice cream to buy. So what does it take to get a nation of 330 million people on the same page? Or a world of billions?

It takes an understanding of human psychology. And fear. It takes lots of fear.

Consider the following.

In September of 2020 we reported on the fact official UK Covid response was being steered by a privatized public policy organization, The Behavioral Insights Team, which is affectionately known as the ‘Nudge Unit.’ In a nutshell, it’s job is to make things like standing six feet apart at the cue in Wal-Mart seem life-saving, necessary and normal.

They are pretty good.

Now recently, The Telegraph reported on revelations that members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour have openly admitted that their work in using psychology to influence the public Covid reaction was ‘unethical’ and ‘totalitarian.’


“Independent Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) – SPI-B provides behavioural science advice aimed at anticipating and helping people adhere to interventions that are recommended by medical or epidemiological experts.”

Oh really? Arresting grandma at a park bench on a sunny afternoon is totalitarian? No way.

Below is a long quote from that article. It’s relevant because you need to break free from the notion that the choices we are being given right now reflect an honest assessment of the situation, and therefore equal a logical and healthy response. We don’t have to accept the idea that life itself depends on an experimental vaccine. We are capable of making rational decisions, uninfluenced by fear and peer pressure. That’s the kind of thing adults get to do.

Read this…

“Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was “unethical” and “totalitarian”. Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) expressed regret about the tactics in a new book about the role of psychology in the Government’s Covid-19 response.

SPI-B waarschuwde in maart vorig jaar dat ministers "het waargenomen niveau van persoonlijke bedreiging" van Covid-19 moesten verhogen omdat "een aanzienlijk aantal mensen zich nog steeds niet voldoende persoonlijk bedreigd voelt".

Gavin Morgan, een psycholoog in het team, zei: "Het is duidelijk dat angst gebruiken als controlemiddel niet ethisch is. Angst gebruiken riekt naar totalitarisme. Het is geen ethische houding voor een moderne regering."

Mr Morgan spoke to author Laura Dodsworth, who has spent a year investigating the Government’s tactics for her book “A State of Fear”, published on Monday.

SPI-B is one of the sub-committees that advises the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), led by Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser.

Een SPI-B wetenschapper vertelde mevrouw Dodsworth: "In maart [2020] was de regering erg bezorgd over naleving en ze dachten dat mensen niet zouden willen worden opgesloten. Er waren discussies over dat angst nodig was om naleving te stimuleren, en er werden beslissingen genomen over hoe de angst op te voeren. De manier waarop we angst hebben gebruikt is dystopisch. Het gebruik van angst is zeker ethisch twijfelachtig geweest. Het was als een vreemd experiment. Uiteindelijk is het mislukt omdat mensen te bang werden."

Een ander SPI-B lid zei: "Je zou psychologie 'mind control' kunnen noemen. Dat is wat we doen... we proberen het duidelijk op een positieve manier te doen, maar het is in het verleden op een snode manier gebruikt."

Eén waarschuwde dat "mensen de pandemie gebruiken om de macht te grijpen en dingen door te drukken die anders niet zouden gebeuren... We moeten heel voorzichtig zijn met het autoritarisme dat binnensluipt".

Another said: “Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon… Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually.”

Another member of SPI-B said they were “stunned by the weaponisation of behavioural psychology” during the pandemic, and that “psychologists didn’t seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative. They have too much power and it intoxicates them”.” ~ De Telegraaf

This is but a tiny piece of the whole story. Human psychology is being exploited in a wide array of creative and destructive ways to encourage specific responses to specific crisis without the engineered social system collapsing under the weight of truth and civil disobedience.

What else is in play against your mind? What other social engineering tactics are being employed to manufacture consent and obedience? Do you really believe people are thinking for themselves? Lees hier.

I’ll dig into this in more detail in coming articles, but for now, consider how much repetition there is in messaging, and how much open censorship of information which, “relates to a current major health crisis and contradicts, authoritative scientific consensus.”* The subconscious mind is programmed through repetition. Behavior is largely determined by the subconscious mind.

If you’re feeling pressure around the current circumstances and find yourself going along just to get along, don’t be afraid to speak your truth. Psychology can be used against you, but it can most definitely also be used for your benefit. Rationality is the antidote to fear. In my work as a self-mastery coach I create the opportunity for people to see for themselves what programs are influencing their lives, and help them to create rational plans for action to restore their personal power.