Is there a medication for the “expected” severe COVID-19 vaccine damage?

London, January 26, 2020. People wearing a face masks to protecting themself because of epidemic in China. Selective Focus. Concept of coronavirus quarantine. MERS-Cov, middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV.

On 1/29/2021, Mahmoud Ramadan mohamed Elkazzaz of Kafrelsheikh University near Cairo submitted a study about isotretinoin to the NIH study registry under the number NTC04730895. This drug is intended to protect all vaccinated individuals whose cells produce coronavirus spikes after a gene vaccination from the expected severe side effects. This could be a big hit, as there are already about 5 million vaccinated people in Germany who could experience the announced severe side effects.

What the study shows us

Study: “Isotretinoin (13- Cis-Retinoic Acid) Versus Spike Protein Based Vaccine for Providing Complete Protection Against COVID-19 and Preventing the Expected Long Term Serious Side Effects Which May Caused by Spike Protein Based Vaccine-An Urgent Protective Clinical Trial (Isotretinoin).”

In a short time, the spike protein-based vaccine was approved as an emergency solution and is now being introduced. The spike protein-based vaccine provides guidance and signals for our cells to express a component of the so-called “viral spike protein”. The strong interaction between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein (SP) produced by the COVID-19 vaccine, or found on the spike protein of viral particles, has an affinity (~10 nM), and this binding affinity is equivalent to that of many monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).

Therefore, the association of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with the binding domain of spike protein is likely to be a strong and long-lasting interaction, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is expected to enter antigen-presenting cells associated with the spike protein of COVID-19 vaccine or the spike protein of viral particles.

Are they really dangerous?

The risk that the substance being tested aims to reduce has been known for some months. In a large Chinese study that has already been published on 9/4/2020 in the Journal of Hematology & Oncology, i.e. well before the Covid-19 vaccines were approved or even used, it had been proven that the spikes of the coronaviruses, if they enter the bloodstream, can cause great damage, e.g. through minute thromboses in the capillaries of many organs. Especially in the lungs such microthromboses are to be feared. Read here.

The Chinese study and also a study by the Paul Ehrlich Institute had been carried out to show the world how dangerous coronaviruses were.

Coronaviruses and their spikes themselves are dangerous, but only if they get into the blood! Fortunately, this is extremely rare unless treatment or other circumstances have bypassed or damaged the normally effective protective mechanisms in the upper airways.

Hidden side effects

The vaccination, however, bypasses the natural barriers against coronaviruses and goes directly into the shoulder muscle, which is well supplied with blood. Whether the dangerous spike proteins are only formed there or whether other target cells are also stimulated to do so is not known for sure.

Such severe side effects of the ongoing coronavirus vaccinations are not talked about anywhere. Even the Paul Ehrlich Institute has not mentioned them in his work on the further risks posed by spike proteins (cell fusions). Read here.

In addition, there are dangerous immunological false alarms with life-threatening consequences that can no longer be controlled naturally, and there is also the risk of becoming the victim of an ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement) in the event of subsequent contact with coronaviruses.

In the meantime, there are increasing reports from Israel, Great Britain and Germany about a high excess mortality among the vaccinated. A connection is criminally rarely thoroughly investigated but consistently brushed aside as not given.

In view of the minimal additional protection provided by vaccination, I consider the continuation of vaccination campaigns to be irresponsible and call for their immediate halt.


What's Your Reaction?

confused confused
fail fail
love love
lol lol
omg omg
win win