Germs are born in us and from us as an Outfection and NOT an Infection of the Body Cells. In other words germs are symptoms of cellular and genetic disorganization and NOT the specific cause of the cellular and genetic disorganization! The GERM is NOTHING and the TERRAIN is EVERYTHING . Germs can only contribute to a state of toxic imbalance but can NEVER cause ANY specific sickness or disease! – Dr. Robert O. Young
Phase Contrast, Dark Field, Bright Field Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines!
Currently there are four major pharmaceutical companies who manufacture a SARS-CoV-2 now called SARS-CoV-19 vaccine. These manufactures and their vaccine are Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson, a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The intended purpose of these vaccines are to provide immunity from the so-called infectious novel coronavirus or SARS-CoV – 2 virus now called the SARS-CoV – 19. These four pharmaceutical companies have not provided complete FDA disclosure on their vaccine box, insert fact sheet or label for many of the major and/or minor ingredients contained within these so-called vaccines. The purpose of this research article is to identify those specific major and minor ingredients contained in the Pfizer Vaccine, the Moderna Vaccine, the Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen Vaccine using various scientific anatomical, physiological and functional testing for each SARS-COV-2-19 vaccine. As a human right, governed under World Law by the Nuremberg Code of 1947, the vaccine specific ingredient information is critical, required and necessary to know so that any human from any country in the World can make an informed decision whether or not to consent to the SAR-CoV-2-19 inoculation. We have conducted the scientific testing on each vaccine and have identified several ingredients or adjuvants that have not been disclosed which are contained in these four SARS-CoV – 2 -19 vaccines. Currently, these vaccines are being administered to millions of humans around the World under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) issued by each country without full disclosure of all ingredients and in some cases mandated by governments or employers in violation of individual human rights under the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
Methodology and Techniques
Four “vaccines” were analyzed which are the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson, using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nano particulate technological approaches. The different instrumentation includes Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, pHase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance and Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines” morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.
Live Blood Phase Contrast and Dark-Field Microscopy
Images of the aqueous fractions of the vaccines were subsequently obtained to visually assess the possible presence of carbon particulates or graphene.
The observations under optical microscopy revealed and abundance of transparent 2D laminar objects that show great similarity with images from literature (Xu et al, 2019), and with images obtained from rGO standard (SIGMA)(Figures 1, 2 and 3).
Images of big transparent sheets of variable size and shapes were obtained, showing corrugated and flat, irregular. Smaller sheets of polygonal shapes, also similar to flakes described in literature (Xu et al, 2019) can be revealed with pHase Contrast and Dark-Field microscopy (Figure 3).
All these laminar objects were widespread in the aqueous fraction of the blood (Figure 1) or vaccine sample (Figures 2 and 3) and no component described by the registered patent can be associated with these sheets.
In Figure 1 You Can See What A Cluster Bomb of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Looks Like in the Live Unstained Live Blood From the So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen “Vaccines”!
Normal Healthy Normal Blood and After mRNA Inoculation
Nano and Micro Graphene Tubes Cause Pathological Blood Coagulation Leading to Hypercapnia, Hypoxia and Death
What Are the Non-Disclosed Ingredients Contained in CoV – 19 So-Called Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen “Vaccines”?
To answer this question an aqueous fraction of the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen vaccines were taken from each vile and then viewed separately under pHase Contrast Microscopy at 100x, 600x up to1500x magnification showing anatomical evidence of reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) particulates which were compared to micrographs of rGO from Choucair et al, 2009 for identification and verification.
Steps of Analysis of Vaccine Aqueous Fractions
Refrigerated samples were processed under sterile conditions, using laminar flow chamber and sterilized lab ware.
Steps for analyses were:
1. Dilution in 0.9% sterile physiological saline (0.45 ml + 1.2 ml)
2. Polarity fractionation: 1.2 ml hexane + 120 ul of RD1 sample
3. Extraction of hydrophilic aqueous pHase
4. UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy scanning
5. Extraction and quantification of RNA in the sample
6. Electron and optical microscopy of aqueous pHase
The Pfizer “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients
The micrographs in Figures 2 and 3 were obtained using 100X, 600X and 1200X pHase Contrast, Dark Field and Bright Field Optical Microscopy.
On the left of each micrograph you will view micrographs obtained from the Pfizer vaccine aqueous fraction containing rGO.
On the right of each micrograph you will view a match from known sources containing rGO for anatomical validation.
The observations under a pHase Contrast, Dark-Field, Bright-Field microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron microscopy of the vaccine product by Pfizer, including vaccine products of Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen revealed some entities that can be graphene strips as seen below in Figure 3.
For a definitive identification of graphene by TEM, it is necessary to complement the observation with the structural characterization by obtaining a characteristic electron diffraction standard sample (as the figure ‘b’ shown below).
The standard sample corresponding to graphite or graphene has a hexagonal symmetry, and generally has several concentric hexagons.
Using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) we observed an intricate matrix or mesh of folded translucent flexible rGO sheets with a mixture of darker multilayer agglomerations and lighter colored of unfolded monolayers as seen in Figure 5. 
The darker linear areas in Figure 5 appear to be local overlap of sheets and local arrangement of individual sheets in parallel to the electron beam.
After the mesh, a high density of unidentified rounded and elliptical clear shapes appears, possibly corresponding to holes generated by mechanical forcing of the rGO mesh during treatment as seen in Figure 6.
The Immune Response to Dietary, Metabolic, Environmental and Respiratory Acids Including Inoculated Organic and Inorganic Micro and Nano Particulates From So-Callled “Vaccines”
The bright orange blood crystal below is solidified uric acid from the ingestion of a high protein diet from animal flesh, blood and interstitial fluids. You will note that there are several neutrophils attempting to clean-up and remove this toxic mass. This is the main purpose of white blood cells which is to manage and maintain the delicate alkaline pH balance of the body fluids.
As you watch the video above you view two neutrophils (neutrophils make up 2/3rds of the total white blood count) swimming through the blood plasma. The neutrophil from the left is moving downward to pick up a biological transformation of a Y-form yeast, like Candida albicans. Within about one minute you will see this neutrophil expel this highly toxic Y-form yeast back into the blood plasma.
This is the main function of neutrophils to pick up organic and non-organic micro and nano particulates, such as lactic acid, uric acid, bacteria, yeast, mold and even graphene oxide as seen in the micrograph below labeled GO to the right and a neutrophil labeled NET to the left.
Once again, the neutrophils are white blood cells attempting to isolate and then pick up and remove the graphene oxide, a toxic acidic pathogen which is contained in all CoV – 2 – 19 so-called vaccines as seen in the Dark Field microscopy micrograph below!
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveals rGO in Pfizer Vaccine
The Pfizer vaccine liquid fraction was then analyzed for chemical and elemental content using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) as seen in Figure 6. The EDS spectrum showed the presence of Carbon, Oxygen verifying the rGO elements and Sodium and Chloride since the sample shown in Figures 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 7a were diluted in a saline solution.
The Quantification of mRNA in the Pfizer Vaccine
The quantification of RNA in the Pfizer sample was carried out with conventional protocols (Fisher).
According to NanoDropTM 2000 spectrophotometer calibration check specific software (Thermofisher), the UV absorption spectrum of total aqueous fraction was correlated to 747 ng/ul of unknown absorbing substances.
However, after RNA extraction with commercial kit (Thermofisher), quantification with RNA specific Qbit fluorescence probe (Thermofisher) showed that only 6t ug/ul could be related to the presence of RNA. The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm.
According to microscopic images presented here, most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in the fluids suspension in the sample.
The conclusions are further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for rGO. It must be reminded that RNA does not show spontaneous fluorescence under UV exposure.
Ultra Violet Fluorescence Testing of the Pfizer Aqueous Fraction for Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO)
Ultra Violet absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained with Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Spectrophotometer (BioteK). UV absorbance spectrum confirmed a maximum peak at 270nm, compatible with presence of rGO particulate.
UV fluorescence maximum at 340 nm also suggests presence of significant amounts of rGO in the sample (Bano et al, 2019).
Figures 11 and 12 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) that reveals the particle size, composition distribution and chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates under observation.
Figures 13 and 14 below shows a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen, so-called “vaccines” and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) that reveals the particle size, composition distribution and chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates under observation.
Are There Parasites in the Pfizer “Vaccines”?
A 50 micron elongated body, as seen in Figure 13 is a sharp mysterious presence in the Pfizer vaccine. It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite of which several variants are lethal and is one of many causes of acquired immune deficiency syndrome or AIDS. [Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178]
Figure 14 identifies a composition of nano particulates including carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen also found in the CoV-19 “vaccines”.
Figures 15 and 16 below show a micrograph of different micro and nano particulates which have been identified and analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates and their morphology.
The white 2-micron-long particulate is composed of bismuth, carbon, oxygen, aluminum, sodium, copper and nitrogen.
Figures 17 and 18 show the identification of organic carbon, oxygen and nitrogen particulates with an aggregate of embedded nanoparticles including bismuth, titanium, vanadium, iron, copper, silicon and aluminum which were all found in the so-called Pfizer “vaccine.”
The Astrazeneca “Vaccine” Non-disclosed Ingredients
Figures 19 and 20 show an engineered aggregate of iron, chromium and nickel also known as stainless steel of micro and nano particles embedded and identified in the Astrazeneca “vaccine” viewed under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified (EDS) with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System ( that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates and their morphology.
The XRF (X-ray fluorescence) instrument was used to evaluate the adjuvants in the Astrazeneca “vaccine”, which identified the following molecules of histidine, sucrose, Poly-ethylene glycol (PEG) and ethylene alcohol, also contained in the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines”. The results of this test can be seen in Figure 20.
The injection of PEG and Ethylene alcohol are both known as carcinogenic and genotoxic. PEG was the only adjuvant declared on the data sheet listing the ingredients of the Astrazeneca “vaccine” but also contained in the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines”.
The Janssen “Vaccine” Non-Disclosed Ingredients
Figures 22 and 23 shows an organic-inorganic aggregate identified in the Janssen “vaccine”. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue” of reduced graphene oxide. This aggregate is highly magnetic and can trigger pathological blood coagulation and “The Corona Effect” or “The Spike Protein Effect” creation from the degeneration of the cell membrane due to interactions with other dipoles. You can view these biological reactions or cellular transformations in the live blood under pHase Contrast and Dark Field Microscopy in Figures 24, 25 and 26.
The Corona Effect and Spike Protein Effect
The Endogenously Created “Corona Effect” and “Spike Protein” ARE Caused by Chemical and Radiation Poisoning from Reduced Graphene Oxide and Microwave Radiation!
Figures 24 and 25 above show ‘The CORONA EFFECT’ on the red blood cells with Figure 26 showing ‘The SPIKED PROTEIN EFFECT’ both caused by decompensated acidosis of the interstitial and then vascular fluids from an acidic lifestyle and specifically, exposure to toxic pulsating electro-magnetic fields at 2.4gHz or higher, chemical poisoning from the food and water ingested, toxic acidic air pollution, chem-trails and to top-it-all-off a nano particulate chemical laden CoV – 19 inoculation! Please check your feelings and false beliefs at the door before YOU prematurely cause YOURSELF harm!
The Moderna “Vaccine” Non-Disclosed Ingredients
Figure 26 and 27 identified a mixed entity of organic and inorganic matter contained in the Moderna “vaccine.”
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TMS) and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) revealed the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates.
The so-called Moderna “vaccine” is a carbon-based Reduced Graphene Oxide substrate where some nanoparticles are embedded. The nanoparticles are composed of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, aluminum, copper, iron and chlorine.
Figures 27 and 28 shows an analysis which was also performed under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System (EDS) and revealed the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates. Many foreign bodies were identified with a spherical morphology with some bubble-shaped cavities.
Figure 29 shows they are composed of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, lead, cadmium, and selenium. This highly toxic nano particulate composition are quantum dots of cadmium selenide which are cytotoxic and genotoxic.
The SARS-CoVid-2-19 pandemic induced the pharmaceutical industries to develop new drugs that they called vaccines.
The mechanism of action of these new drugs as declared by the pharmaceutical industry coupled with what is reported in the vaccine products’ data sheet is NOT clear for current medical savants to understand that those new drugs produced by Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA Vaccine, the Moderna-Lonza mRNA-1273 Vaccine, the Serum Institute Oxford Astrazeneca Vaccine and the Janssen COVID -19 Vaccine, manufactured by Janssen Biotech Inc., a Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of Johnson & Johnson are NOT vaccines but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy.
The name “vaccine” is likely to be an escamotage (trickery) used for bureaucratic and technocratic reasons in order to receive an urgent approval, ignoring all the normal rules necessary for new drugs, especially for those involving novel nanotechnological mechanisms which have never been developed nor experienced by humans any where, at any time in the history of World.
All these so-called “vaccines” are patented and therefore their actual content is kept secret even to the buyers, who, of course, are using taxpayers’ money. So, consumers (taxpayers) have no information about what they are receiving in their bodies by inoculation. Humanity is kept in the dark as far as the nano particulate technological processes involved are concerning, on the negative effects on the cells of the body, but mostly on the possible magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic nano-bio-interaction effect on the blood and body cells.
This current research study via direct analysis on the aforementioned so-called “vaccines” by means of nano particulate technological instrumentation reveals disturbing and life-altering information concerning the truth about the actual toxic acidic contents and their effects of these so-called “vaccines”.
The Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen drugs are NOT “vaccines” but complexed Graphene Oxide nano particulate aggregates of varying nano elements attached to genetically modified nucleic acids of mRNA from animal or vero cells and aborted human fetal cells as viewed and described above. Once again the ingredients in these so-called vaccines are highly magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plant, insect, bird, animal and human cell membranes and their genetics which already has lead to serious injuries (estimated at over 500 million) and/or death (estimated at over 35 million). through 
The so-called “experts” or “medical savants” are telling YOU that CoV -2 – 19 vaccines are the ONLY way to stop the spread of CoV-19… even when there is NO EVIDENCE of its existence and NO EVIDENCE of it spreading as determined by the scientific method of Koch or Rivers postulates!
That they’re safe — despite the documented evidence is to the contrary…
That they’re effective — even though millions of “double-jabbed” people are getting sick, theoretically exposing themselves to a NON-EXISTENT VIRUS called CoV – 19, and dying… NOT from some phantom viral infection but from the FEAR or false evidence appearing real and the toxic acid contents of reduced graphene oxide delivered via the genetically modified mRNA to specific targets of the human body leading to pathological blood coagulation, oxygen deprivation, hypercapnia, hypoxia and then death by suffocation.
That YOU MUST get at LEAST two shots PLUS “boosters” to live “normal lives”…
And soon, they’ll be telling YOU that YOU have no choice but to comply with ALL their MANdates even when the CDC and other Governments, Universities and Medical Institutes have admitted in writing that they have NO “GOLD STANDARD” isolation of the CoV – 2 now called CoV – 19 virus!
There is NO CORONA VIRUS and NEVER HAS BEEN!
DON’T LET ANYONE TAKE AWAY YOUR HEALTH FREEDOM!
It is YOUR Body, YOUR Life and YOUR Choice!
Knowledge is power. And it’s the key to understanding why the experimental CoV -19 vaccines are so dangerous — despite the corporate media’s official narrative that suppresses and censors anyone who dares to speak out.
You are in control of your own health. Don’t fall victim to global governments and bureaucrats that are pushing everyone to get vaccinated. Billionaire “philanthropist” Bill Gates and billionaire Big Tech activists think they know what’s best for you and your family.
You must be free to decide what’s right for you. Do NOT let governments and employers force you into getting “vaxxed” “for your own good”.
And never let the cancel culture make you too afraid to stand up for your rights!
In the words of the great French doctor and scientist, Antione BeChamp, “there is nothing so false that does NOT contain an element of truth and so it is with the germ theory.” In this case the viral, vaccine and immunity theory!
To learn more about viruses, vaccines and the viral theory please read and study, A Second Thought About Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV AIDS Hypothesis.
Read and Learn More About Viruses, Vaccines and the Viral Theory in the Following Scientific Articles!
1. Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Results Revealing Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines – An Interview with Dr. Robert O. Young.
An absolute bombshell and major reveals on what is in the vaccines, with use of electron and other kinds of microscopy from original research by Dr. Robert Young and his team, confirming what the La Quinta Columna researchers found—toxic nanometallic content with cytotoxic and genotoxic effects as well as an identified parasite. This is major revelation: please stay tuned for a major article reporting this at ECC, meanwhile please share this video widely!
2. The Epidemic Curves of the Most Vaccinated Countries:
3. Sweden Is Following the Biological Science NOT the Political Science:
4. What is Happening in India:
5. Surviving the Plague of Corruption:
6. Dismantling the Viral Theory:
7. Corona on Trial:
8. The Havana Cuba Syndrome Caused by Directed Pulsating EMF Microwaves:
9. CDC NOW Admits NO ‘Gold Standard’ for the Isolation for ANY Virus:
10. Freedom of Information Responses on CoV – 2 Now Called CoV – 19:
11. Why Viruses Do Not Exist:
12. Report 255 | Dr. Robert Young: All Disease is Outfection Not Infection–Vaccine Nano is Bioweapon:
13. Report 255 | Dr. Robert Young: All Disease is Outfection, not Infection | The Vaccine’s Lipid Nanoparticles with Graphene Plus Radiation is the Bioweapon–No COVID Virus Exists:
14. Report 255 | Dr. Robert Young: All Disease is Outfection Not Infection–Vaccine Nano is Bioweapon:
15. Forget Everything Else! Look at THE VAER’s NUMBERS on Injuries and Deaths:
16. Dr. Robert O. Young ITNJ Testimony
17. The Pfizer patent application
The Pfizer patent application approved, August 31st, 2021 is the very first patent that shows up in a list of over 18500 for the purpose of remote contact tracing of all vaccinated humans worldwide who will be or are now connected to the “internet of things” by a quantum link of pulsating microwave frequencies of 2.4 gHz or higher from cell towers and satellites directly to the graphene oxide held in the fatty tissues of all persons inoculated. 
18. The General Architecture of Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs)-based TRANS-HUMAN System 
Wireless Connections from Cell Towers or Satellites to YOU!
Updated PDF file of this article:
1. Ou, L., Song, B., Liang, H. et al. Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. Part Fibre Toxicol13, 57 (2016):
2. Young RO (2016) Pathological Blood Coagulation and the Mycotoxic Oxidative Stress Test (MOST). Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(6): 00048. DOI:
3. Xu et al, (2019) Identification of graphene oxide and its structural features in solvents by optical microscopy, RSC Adv., 9, 18559-18564:
1-Extracction RNA Kit:
4. Muestra RD1, La Quinta Columna Report, June 28, 2021; Graphene Oxide Detection in Aqueous Suspension; Delgado Martin, Campra Madrid.
5. Kim et al, Seeing graphene-based sheets, Materials Today,Volume 13, Issue 3,2010,Pages 28- 38,ISSN 1369-7021:
6. Bano, I. et al , 2019. Exploring the fluorescence properties of reduced graphene oxide with tunable device performance,Diamond and Related Materials,Volume 94,59-64,ISSN 0925- 9635,
7. Biroju, Ravi & Narayanan, Tharangattu & Vineesh, Thazhe Veettil. (2018). New advances in 2D electrochemistry—Catalysis and Sensing. 10.1201/9781315152042-7.
8. Choucair, M., Thordarson, P. & Stride, J. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nature Nanotech 4, 30–33 (2009).
9. Atlas of Human Parasitology, 4th Edition, Lawrence Ash and Thomas Orithel, pages 174 to 178
10. Mano, S.S.; Kanehira, K.; Sonezaki, S.; Taniguchi, A. Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Modification of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Cytotoxicity and Gene Expressions in Human Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci.2012, 13, 3703-3717.
11. Srivastava AK, Dwivedi N, Dhand C, et al. Potential of graphene-based materials to combat COVID-19: properties, perspectives, and prospects. Mater Today Chem. 2020;18:100385. doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100385
12. Young, RO, “The Effects of ElectroMagnetic Frequencies (EMF) on the Blood and Biological Terrain.
13. Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.
14. Nikazar, S., Sivasankarapillai, V.S., Rahdar, A. et al. Revisiting the cytotoxicity of quantum dots: an in-depth overview. Biophys Rev 12, 703–718 (2020).
15. Ritesh Banerjee, Priya Goswami, Manoswini Chakrabarti, Debolina Chakraborty, Amitava Mukherjee, Anita Mukherjee, Cadmium selenide (CdSe) quantum dots cause genotoxicity and oxidative stress in Allium cepa plants, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Volume 865, 2021, 503338,ISSN 1383-5718
16. Wanjun Cao, Lin He, Weidong Cao, Xiaobing Huang, Kun Jia, Jingying Dai, Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant, Acta Biomaterialia, Volume 112, 2020, Pages 14-28, ISSN 1742-7061
17. Concise Encyclopedia of Composite Materials, ed. Anthony Kelly, MIT Press, 1989
18. L. Harivardhan Reddy, José L. Arias, Julien Nicolas, and Patrick Couvreur, “Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design and Characterization, Toxicity and Biocompatibility, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications.” Chemical Reviews 2012 112 (11), 5818-5878 DOI: 10.1021/cr300068p
19. US Dpt of health and human services (1996) Report Update: Vaccine Side Effects, Adverse Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions. CDC 45(RR-12): 1-35.
20. Ottaviani G, Lavezzi AM, Matturri L (2006) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Arch 448(1): 100-104.
21. Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington CP, Petropoulos MC, Favot-Mayaud I, et al. (1999) Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet 353(9169): 2026-2029.
22. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C (2012) Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2): CD004407. New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination 13/13 Copyright: ©2016 Gatti et al. Citation: Gatti AM, Montanari S (2016) New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 4(1): 00072. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2017.04.00072
23. Carola Bardage, Ingemar Persson, Åke Örtqvist, Ulf Bergman, Jonas F Ludvigsson, et al. (2011) Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with a monovalent adjuvanted vaccine: population based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden. BMJ 343: d5956.
24. Johann Liang R (2012) Updating the Vaccine Injury Table following the 2011 IOM Report on Adverse Effects of vaccines. HRSA, pp. 1-27.
25. L Tomljenovic, CA Shaw (2011) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? Current Medicinal Chemistry 18(17): 2630-2637.
26. Shaw CA, Petrik MS (2009) Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem 103(11): 1555-1562.
27. Authier FJ, Sauvat S, Christov C, Chariot P, Raisbeck G, et al. (2006) AlOH3-adjuvanted vaccine-induced macrophagic myofasciitis in rats is influenced by the genetic background. Neuromuscul Disord 16(5): 347-352.
28. Exley C, Esiri MM (2006) Severe cerebral congophilic angiopathy coincident with increased brain aluminium in a resident of Camelford, Cornwall, UK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(7): 877- 879.
29. Wills MR, Savory J (1985) Water content of aluminium, dialysis dementia, and osteomalacia. Environ Health Perspect 63: 141-147.
30. Brinth L, Pors K, Theibel AC, Mehlsen J (2015) Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine. Danish Medical J 62(4): 1-12.
31. Palmieri B, Poddighe D, Vadalà M, Laurino C, Carnovale C, et al. (2016) Severe somatoform and dysautonomic syndromes after HPV vaccination: case series and review of literature. Immunol Res.
32. Visani G, Manti A, Valentini L, Canonico B, Loscocco F, et al. (2016) Environmental nanoparticles are significantly over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 50: 50-56.
33. Artoni E, Sighinolfi GL, Gatti AM, Sebastiani M, Colaci M, et al. (2016) Micro and nanoparticles as possible pathogenetic co-factors in mixed cryoglobulinemia. Occupational Medicine.
34. T Hansen, L Klimek, F Bittinger, I Hansen, A Gatti, et al. (2008) Mast cell reiches Aluminium granuloma Pathologe 29(4): 311-313.
35. Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.
36. Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S, Wlodarski A, Kuharev J, et al. (2011) Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5(9): 7155-167.
37. Radauer Preiml , Andosch A, Hawranek T, Luetz-Meindl U, Wiederstein M, et al. (2015) Nanoparticle-allergen interactions mediate human allergic responses: protein corona characterization and cellular responses. Fibre toxicology 13: 3.
38. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggård T, Thulin E, et al. (2016) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. PNAS 104 (7): 2050-2055.
39. Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, et al. (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 134-135: 167-174.
40. Gatti AM, Quaglino D, Sighinolfi GL (2009) A Morphological Approach to Monitor the Nanoparticle-Cell Interaction. International Journal of Imaging and Robotics 2: 2-21.
41. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO (1994) Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 76(9): 1345-1359.
42. Kirkpatrick CJ, Barth S, Gerdes T, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Peters (K 2002) Pathomechanisms of impaired wound healing by metallic corrosion products. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6(3): 183-190.
43. Lee SH, Brennan FR, Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Ragasa DR, et al. (1997) Human monocyte/macrophage response to cobalt-chromium corrosion products and titanium particles in patients with total joint replacements. J Orthop Res 15(1): 40-49.
44. Shaw CA, Seneff S, Kette SD, Tomljenovic L, Oller Jr JW, et al. (2014) Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease. Journal of Toxicology 2014: 491316.
45. Shaw CA, Kette SD, Davidson RM, Seneff S (2013) Aluminum™s Role in CNS-immune System Interactions leading to Neurological Disorders. Immunome Research 9: 069.
46. Seneff S, Swanson N, Chen Li (2015) Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease. Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 42- 70.
47. Pegaz B, Debefve E, Ballini JP, Konan-Kouakou YN, van den Bergh HJ (2006) Effect of nanoparticle size on the extravasations and the photothrombic activity of meso(p-tetracarboxyphenyl)porphyrin. J Photochem Photobiol B 85(3): 216-222.
48. Brinth LS, Pors K, Hoppe AG, Badreldin I, Mehlsen J (2015) Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis a Relevant Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Side Effects to Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine? International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination 1(1):1-5.
49. Moos WH, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, et al. (2016) Microbiota and Neurological Disorders: A Gut Feeling. Biores Open Access 5(1): 137-145.
50. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Caetano L, Antunes M, Brett (2010) Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiological Rev 90(3): 859-904.
51. Umbrello G, Esposito S (2016) Microbiota and neurologic diseases: potential effects of probiotics. J Transl Med 14(1): 298.
52. Kinoshita T, Abe RT, Hineno A, Tsunekawa K, Nakane S, et al. (2014) Peripheral sympathetic nerve dysfunction in adolescent Japanese girls following immunization with the human papillomavirus vaccine. Intern Med 53(19): 2185-2200.
53. Zhang L, Richards A, Khalil A, Wogram E, Ma H, Young RA, Jaenisch R. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Dec 13:2020.12.12.422516. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.12.422516. PMID: 33330870; PMCID: PMC7743078.
54. Young, RO, “Forget Everything Else! Look at THE VAER’s NUMBERS on Injuries and Deaths!.
55. Young, RO, “CDC NOW Admits NO ‘Gold Standard’ for the Isolation for ANY Virus!
56. Young, RO, “The Genesis of Severe Acute Respiratory (Syndrome) or SARS & Corona Virus or COVID – 19.
57. Young, RO, “What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS – CoV 2 & 19)?
58. Young RO, Migalko G (2020) What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS – CoV 2 & 12)?. Integ Mol Bio Biotechnol 1: 001-007. http://sciaeon.org/articles/What-Causes-Oxygen-Deprivation-of-the-Blood-DIC-and-Then-Lungs-SARS-CoV2and12.pdf
59. Young RO (2016) Who Had Their Finger on the Magic of Life – Antoine Bechamp or Louis Pasteur?. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(5): 00047. DOI:
60. Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 1. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00032. DOI:
61. Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 2. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00034. DOI:
62. Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 3 HIV/AIDS and the Monomorphic Disease Model. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00035. DOI:
63. Wu HY, Lin KJ, Wang PY, Lin CW, Yang HW, Ma CC, Lu YJ, Jan TR. Polyethylene glycol-coated graphene oxide attenuates antigen-specific IgE production and enhanced antigen-induced T-cell reactivity in ovalbumin-sensitized BALB/c mice. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 Sep 8;9:4257-66. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S66768. PMID: 25228804; PMCID: PMC4162634.
64. Xu L, Xiang J, Liu Y, Xu J, Luo Y, Feng L, Liu Z, Peng R. Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity. Nanoscale. 2016 Feb 14;8(6):3785-95. doi: 10.1039/c5nr09208f. Epub 2016 Jan 27. PMID: 26814441.
65. Xu L, Xiang J, Liu Y, Xu J, Luo Y, Feng L, Liu Z, Peng R. Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity. Nanoscale. 2016 Feb 14;8(6):3785-95. doi: 10.1039/c5nr09208f. Epub 2016 Jan 27. PMID: 26814441.
66. Cao W, He L, Cao W, Huang X, Jia K, Dai J. Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant. Acta Biomater. 2020 Aug;112:14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 10. PMID: 32531395.
67. Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as carrier – Patent
The invention belongs to the field of nano materials and biomedicine, and relates to a vaccine, in particular to development of 2019-nCoV coronavirus nuclear recombinant nano vaccine. The invention also comprises a preparation method of the vaccine and application of the vaccine in animal experiments. The new corona vaccine contains graphene oxide, carnosine, CpG and new corona virus RBD; binding carnosine, CpG and neocoronavirus RBD on the backbone of graphene oxide; the CpG coding sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO 1; the novel coronavirus RBD refers to a novel coronavirus protein receptor binding region which can generate a high-titer specific antibody aiming at the RBD in a mouse body, and provides a strong support for prevention and treatment of the novel coronavirus.
68. Takizawa K, Aoyagi A, Takada J, Katayama N, Yekeh K, Takehiko Y, Kohno KR. Channel models for wireless body area networks. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1549-52. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649465. PMID: 19162968.
69. Le, Thien T T, and Sangman Moh. “Interference Mitigation Schemes for Wireless Body Area Sensor Networks: A Comparative Survey.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 15,6 13805-38. 11 Jun. 2015, doi:10.3390/s150613805
70. “Project: Soul Catcher: Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed” Paperback – September 27, 2010. Volume 2 details the CIA’s practices of interrogation and cybernetic mind control in their pursuit to weaponize neuropsychology. It covers the art of bio-communication war. Human beings are complex machines but their inner workings have been deciphered. Mind control and brainwashing have been perfected in the last 60 years. Hacking computers and hacking into individual minds are similar. The 21st century will be known as the age of spiritual machines and soulless men.
71. Mehrotra, Parikha et al. “EM-Wave Biosensors: A Review of RF, Microwave, mm-Wave and Optical Sensing.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 19,5 1013. 27 Feb. 2019, doi:10.3390/s19051013
72. Ferritin Nanoparticle Compositions and Methods to Modulate Cell activity granted a Patent US10786570B2 on 09-29-2020 to Jerffery Friedman and the Rockefeller University.
WO US US10786570B2 Jeffrey Friedman The Rockefeller University Priority 2011-08-24 • Filed 2018-07-30 • Granted 2020-09-29 • Published 2020-09-29 The present invention provides methods and compositions for the remote control of cell function based on the use of radiofrequency waves to excite nanoparticles targeted to specific cell types. The nanoparticles may be applied to the target cell extracellularly and/or expressed intracellularly.
73. Ou, L., Song, B., Liang, H. et al. “Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms.” Part Fibre Toxicol13, 57 (2016).
74. “Graphene Ribbons Show Promise as Semiconductors”, Volume 86, Issue 3, Chemical and Engneering News, Bethany Halford, Volume 86, Issue 4, January 28th, 2008.