A re-analysis of data from Israel’s Ministry of Health concluded that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine killed “about 40 times more old people than the disease itself would have killed” during a recent five-week vaccination period, and 260 times more younger people than would have died from the virus.
Experimental mRNA vaccine
While in January a group of independent doctors concluded that the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are “no safer” than the virus itself, a new analysis of vaccine-related death rates in Israel shows that this may indeed be the case to a dramatic degree.
A re-analysis of published data from the Israeli Ministry of Health by Dr. Hervé Seligmann, a member of the faculty of medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases at the University of Aix-Marseille, and engineer Haim Yativ show, in short, that Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine during a recent five-week vaccination period “killed about 40 times more elderly people than the disease itself would have killed.” Among the younger, these numbers add up to death rates 260 times what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame.
While the full mathematical analysis can be found in the article itself, the authors show how among “those vaccinated and over 65 years of age, 0.2% … died during the three-week period between doses, or about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated. This compares with the 4.91 deaths among 100,000 who died from COVID-19 without vaccination.”
“This frightening picture also extends to persons younger than 65 years,” the researchers added. During the five-week vaccination period, “0.05%, or 50 per 100,000, died. This compares with the 0.19 per 100,000 who die from COVID-19 who are not vaccinated … Therefore, the death rate of this age group increased 260-fold during this five-week period of vaccination compared with their natural COVID-19 death rate.”
As IsraelNationalNews (INN) reports, Seligmann has an Israeli-Luxembourg nationality, and a degree in biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has authored more than 100 scientific publications. INN reports that the researchers “have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.”
Yativ and Seligmann note that even these “estimated numbers of deaths from the vaccine are likely much lower than the actual numbers because they only take into account deaths defined as COVID-19 for this short period and do not include AVC and cardiac (and other) events resulting from the inflammatory responses.”
Also, these figures “do not take into account long-term complications,” they write.
Furthermore, they expect that within a few months “medium and long-term side effects of vaccination will manifest in the form of an ADE (Antibody-Dependent Enhancement)” in those who received the experimental Pfizer vaccine.
As explained by America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), ADE is “when the COVID antibodies produced by a vaccine, rather than protecting the person, cause a more severe or fatal illness when the person is then exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild at a later time. The vaccine increases infection rather than preventing harm.”
The AFLDS cites as an example a vaccine produced to combat dengue fever that led to the deaths of 600 children in the Philippines due to ADEs and led to the filing of criminal charges against the decision makers in 2019.
For these and other reasons, the AFLDS and many other doctors strongly advise against the use of these experimental vaccines for most people. They admit that it could be used for people over 70, but concede that these injections “present a higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with prescribed drugs.”
In light of these death rates, Yativ and Seligmann also harshly criticize the intense pressure exerted by Israeli authorities on the population to receive these injections. According to INN, the researchers refer to these draconian measures as a “new holocaust”.
In recent weeks, Israel’s government made headlines when it introduced a “green pass” system that allows people who have been injected to receive a green code that then grants them access to places like entertainment and recreational facilities.
As the country reopens after a two-month lockdown, the green passport would be issued only to people who have been injected, not to people who have tested negative for the virus. Proposed benefits include access to “non-essential” stores, as well as not having to isolate oneself if identified as a close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19, and not having to isolate oneself when returning from a location the government calls a “red site”.
Although there is no proof that these experimental vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus, Israel’s Health Minister Yuli Edelstein said at the release of the “vaccination passport” that “it is a moral duty to get vaccinated. It is part of our mutual responsibility.” He went further, declaring, “Those who don’t get vaccinated will be left behind.”
The green passport
The green passport must be renewed every six months, and despite possessing one, a person must still abide by the rules on masking and physical distancing. The Jerusalem Post also reported that legislation is being considered that would give employers the right to refuse unvaccinated people entry to the workplace.
Such measures prompted Business Insider to call the country a “war on the unvaccinated.” Meanwhile, Dr. Anthony Fauci, senior medical advisor to President Joe Biden, has deemed Israel’s vaccination response “exceptional.”