How does Global Mind Control work?


We live in a world in which an ever widening gap separates reality and one’s own experience. The masters of perception exercise their power over the unwitting subjects of the state (citizens) with full license from the very people they manipulate – by obtaining the consent of the controlled. The average person believes that their opinions, worldviews and decisions are their own, while at the same time they cannot or do not want to see the hidden hands of manipulation that guide their actions.

Reality Management

Reality management is an informal term that refers to the methods by which citizens can be separated from the real facts, mainly through the production of false perceptions that the undisciplined individual confuses with the truth.

Almost every significant movement of change in the past hundred years, including, but not limited to, music, politics, religion, social reform, and most importantly the New Age movement, are undoubtedly facets of a hidden and insidious agenda that goes back decades.

While all of this sounds hopelessly daunting, the agenda is based on the fact that an individual would rather satiate himself and indulge in physical and emotional pleasures than face the truth and be empowered by it. In other words, these forms of manipulation through mass mind control and social engineering only act on a sleep-wrapped consciousness that chooses not to think critically, to question an appearance, and to believe a feel-good lie rather than you to get to the bottom of it to discover a truth that is difficult to accept.

It is important as an awakening person to understand the extent and scope of social engineering and reality management that has woven into the fabric of modern society. The agents of such a system are not some shadowy figure – although they are there – it is the people themselves who, through their desire to remain ignorant and asleep, become agents of the very system from which they want to free themselves.

In short, ignorance is what makes these control systems thrive. Thus only an individual with the courage to face the hardest truths in the world, and above all himself, and begin the slow and often uncomfortable process of abandoning his addiction to a sick and maladjusted society, becomes a certain amount of internal Find healing and personal liberation.

The think tank of the think tanks – The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations

Forbes
Those who direct the world’s fortunes are never in the limelight.

The Tavistock Institute is the think tank that controls all think tanks in the world. The Tavistok Institute or The Tavistok Institute of Human Realations (TIHR) studies how larger masses of people behave and how the mass consciousness reacts and could govern the environment. Furthermore, I believe that the institute has connections to British Masonic lodges.

Schooling, of course, also plays a big role in the programming of the population, but the most powerful and widely used educational tools are the mass media. These are intended to reach a wide audience through the dissemination of information in a natural (spoken or written language, posters) or technological (radio, television, cinema, internet) way. Over time, the social elite has dominated all major mass media and is now able to determine their content.

The trick is simple. The elite just has to repeat the same simple lies across the media and the people will no doubt believe them. This gives lies an irresistible aura of credibility. A mass brainwashing specialist L. Wolfe explains further:

“As the Tavistock researchers showed, it was important that the victims of mass brainwashing do not know that their surroundings are being controlled; So there should be a variety of sources of information, the messages of which can be easily varied to hide the feeling of external control. “

Wolfe specified that the content should be entertaining and should always leave people with the impression that they always had a choice between different news and sources. Hence, the same repetitive information remains hidden behind different and appealing appearances.

History and structure of the Tavistock Institute

Tavistock

Around 1920 the Tavistock Institute became the center for the study of human behavior, mind control, propaganda, and social manipulation. The London-based company has expanded overseas with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation (the usual suspects).

Three elements make the institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence to be fully self-funding, with no government or other source subsidies; the orientation of action research places it between, but not in, the world of science and consulting; and his range of subjects includes anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.

The ideology of American foundations was developed by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquise of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, donated a building to the Institute to study the effects of grenade strikes on British soldiers who survived the First World War. The study carried out in 1922 with the name ‘Shock Shell’ was not about helping the traumatized soldiers, but rather to calculate when they would ‘break mentally’.

The Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. His prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He received a villa from Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneering work in behavioral research based on Freud’s models of “controlling” people established it as the world center of founding ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the USA via the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies in Georgetown (where State Dept. employees are trained), US Air Force Intelligence, Rand and Miter corporation.

Company personnel are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock-controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society , the Trilateral Commission , the Ditchley Foundation and the Club of Rome , are the interfaces for instructions to the Tavistock network.

The Tavistock Institute developed the mass brainwashing techniques that were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Her experiments with methods of crowd control became widespread in the American public, a clandestine yet outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through modern psychology.

The German refugee Kurt Lewin became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the United States in 1933 and founded the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which gave rise to the propaganda campaign aimed at turning the American public against Germany and involving the United States in World War II.

In 1938, Roosevelt signed a secret agreement with Churchill that ceded US sovereignty to England because it agreed to allow Special Operations Executive to control US policy. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before founding OSS (now the CIA) under the auspices of SOE-SIS . The entire OSS program as well as the CIA have always worked on the guidelines of the Tavistock Institute.

The Tavistock Institute initiated the civilian mass bombing attacks by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror and recorded the results while they observed the “guinea pigs” who reacted under “controlled laboratory conditions”. All Tavistock and American founding techniques have a single goal: to break the psychological strength of the individual and make him helpless to oppose the dictators of the world order. Any technique that helps disintegrate family unity and the family’s inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior are used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control.

The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those undergoing this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to establish “new rituals of personal interaction”, ie indulging in brief sexual encounters that actually drift the participants through their lives without stable personal relationships and destroy their ability to start or maintain a family. The Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the United States that no one gains any prominence in any field unless they are trained in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries.

Henry Kissinger , whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and a student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a psychologist with the Tavistock Institute, elected Jimmy Carter as President of the United States simply because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program conducted by Admiral Hyman Rickover in Annapolis. The “experiment” of forced integration in the USA was organized by Ronald Lippert from the OSS and the American Jewish Congress and is head of child education at the Commission on Community Relations. The program is designed to break the individual’s sense of personal knowledge in his or her identity. Tavistock controls the National Education Association through the Stanford Research Institute. The Institute for Social Research in the National Training Lab ‘Brain washes’ (MK Ultra) the leading executives.

That the entire US space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up can be traced back to Tavistock. The break was in an article by Dr. Anatol Rapport requested and immediately granted by the government the complete mystification of all NASA affiliates.

Another major Tavistock division is the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania. A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy – drug use. The CIA’s infamous MK-Ultra program, where unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD and studied their reaction like “guinea pigs,” resulted in multiple deaths.

The US government had to pay millions in damages to the victims’ families, but the perpetrators were never charged. The program arose when Sandoz AG, a Swiss pharmaceutical company owned by SG Warburg Co., London, developed lysergic acid [LSD]. Roosevelt’s adviser, James Paul Warburg , son of Paul Warburg , who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg , who funded Hitler, set up the Policy Studies Institute to promote the drug. The result was the LSD “counterculture” of the 1960s, the “student revolution”, which was funded with $ 25 million by the CIA.

Part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman from Harvard to conduct further mind control experiments. In the 1950s, the CIA funded extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association and director of the Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give large doses of LSD to 53 patients and record their reactions; the patients were medicated in weeks of sleep and then given an electric shock.

One of the most important, but little-known, activities of the Rockefeller Foundation was its techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, established Rockefeller controlled farming programs across Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the world order because he produces for himself and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet Russia the Bolsheviks believed they had gained total control over the people; they were dismayed to see their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the kulaks. More on that another time.

Stalin ordered the OGPU to confiscate and starve all food and animals of the kulaks. The Chicago American, February 25, 1935, had a front-page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE; Farm cultures have been confiscated, they and their animals are starving.

The Communist Party, the Party of Peasants and Workers, annihilated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found that the smallholder is their biggest stumbling block. The French Empire of Terror was directed not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic, but against the smallholders who refused to hand over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignments. In the United States, the foundations are currently waging the same war of extermination against the American peasant.

The traditional formula of land and labor for the farmer has been changed because the farmer needs purchasing power to buy industrial goods that he needs for his farms. Because of these capital requirements, the farmer is particularly vulnerable to the manipulation of interest rates by the world order, which is driving him to bankruptcy. Just as in the Soviet Union in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work in the kolkhozes, the American smallholder is facing the same kind of destruction that is forcing him to use his small piece of land to give up to become a contract worker for the large agricultural corporations.

Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can see the high interest rates, the high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches in forums for revolutions, the undermining of the universities in CIA cesspools of drug addiction and the government halls in Understand channels of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every federal agent is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF must declare war on the citizen in order to run the foundations’ programs.

The foundations are in direct contradiction to their statutes, which oblige them to do “non-profit” work because they do not grant any donations that are not part of a political goal. The indictment has never been denied that the Heritage AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The use of intelligence workers as “charitable” workers, as happened in the Red Cross Mission in Russia in 1917, reveals the sinister political, economic and social goals that the world order demands from the foundations that it can achieve through its “legacies.”

Not only is it this tax fraud because the foundations are granted tax exemption for charitable purposes only, but it is also criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit crimes against the United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlinking of the foundation syndicate through the names of its main founders – Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund and became the founder of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became the founder of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano was also a founding member of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Daniel Coit Gilman founded the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank. These founding members are closely associated with the Federal Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War War, the OSS of World War II, and the CIA. They are also closely related to the field of

tavistock network

Its main goals were and are to organize cultural change through the imposition of chaos and the manipulation of certain groups. With a budget of around USD 6 billion for 2012, it now consists of 10 institutions, 400 subsidiaries and 3,000 working groups. Tavistock secretly runs powerful multinational corporations like Rand Corp. (Media, politics, commerce, health, education, defense), the Miter Corp. (Defense, Revenue, National Security), the Stanford and Hudson Institute, Institute for policy studies, Institute for the Future, National Training Laboratories, Brookings Institution, Plan and Research Corporation, International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences and of course the Council on Forein Relations etc (where did we hear that before?).

“Without Tavistock there would have been no First and Second World Wars, no Bolshevik revolution, Korea, Vietnam, Serbia and Iraq wars. But for Tavistock, the United States would not rush to disintegrate and collapse. ” -John Coleman.

Mind Control – How the mass of the threads hang their strings

tavistock 2

How do you do that? With which techniques could one easily manipulate an entire society without a critical mass even becoming aware of the manipulation?

Avram Noam Chomsky is one of the most well-known American linguists of today, who – by combining the scientific disciplines of linguistics, cognitive sciences and computer science – exerted a strong influence on their development, especially in the second half of the 20th century. In his short text “10 Strategies to Manipulate Society Completely” he aptly sums up how a fully controlled flow of information can manipulate a society quietly but very profoundly:

Strategies to Manipulate Society Completely

1. Reverse attention
The key element in controlling society is to divert the public’s attention to non-essential events in order to divert them from important information about actual changes by the political and economic governing bodies. That strategy is the cornerstone that prevents basic interest in the areas of education, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. Thus public opinion turns its back on real societal problems, drizzled and distracted by unimportant matters. Make society busy, keep them busy, keep them busy so that they don’t have time to think about anything, according to the level of an animal. [Football, series, talk shows, celebrities, drugs and above all a 40h working week; Divide and rule: right against left, arm against even poorer, white against black]

2. Create problems and provide the solution
This method is called the “problem-reaction-solution”. A problem or situation is created in order to trigger a reaction in the recipients, who then expect a preventive course of action. Spread violence or instigate bloody attacks so that society accepts a tightening of legal norms and laws at the expense of one’s own freedom. Or create an economic crisis to justify a radical curtailment of fundamental rights and the dismantling of social services. [False flag terror-> war and changes in the law, detailed images without which young men would not go to war or strap on explosive belts]

3rd stage Changes
Shift the limits of changes gradually, step by step, year after year. In this way, the new radical socio-economic conditions were implemented in 1980 and 1990 (neoliberalism): a minimum of certificates, privatization, insecurity, and what the next day brings is elasticity, mass unemployment, influence on the level of income , the lack of guarantees of fair wage labor. [Gradual getting used to: mass surveillance, harmful technology, cashless society, censorship of ‘inappropriate content’ / upload filters, etc.]

4. Postponement of changes
The next possibility for acceptance of a change that society does not want is to present it as a “painful must” so that society allows it to be introduced in the future. It is easier to accept future victims than to expose yourself to them right away. In addition, society has the naive tendency to describe negative changes as “everything will be fine”. This strategy gives the citizens more time to become aware of the change and to convert acceptance into a kind of resignation. [“I don’t have to hide anyway”, “That’s the way it is”, “Humanity is fucked up anyway.”, “Next legislative period then …”]

5. Speak to the crowd, as you would speak to young children
The majority of content directed at the public is misused by way of promulgation; They are manipulated by argument or even by a patronizing tone typically used in a conversation with children or the mentally retarded. The more you want to obscure the image in front of your conversation partner, the better you will fall back on this technology. Why? If you speak to a person as if they are 12 years old, it is because you want to suggest exactly that to them. She is most likely to react uncritically or respond as if she were actually 12 years old. [State tutelage, the state tells you what is true and what is wrong, what you can and cannot add to your body, madness in bureaucracy, etc.]

6. Focus on emotions, not reflection.
Abusing the emotional aspect is a classic technique for circumventing rational analysis and common sense in an individual. In addition, an emotional speech opens the door to ideologies, needs, fears and unrest, to evoke impulses and certain behaviors in the subconscious. [Fear, violence and sex in the media: creating addiction by stimulating basic needs, making it easy to control]

7. Try to maintain the ignorance of society
The masses should not be able to recognize the methods and control techniques. Education that is offered to the lower classes of society should be as simple as possible so that academic knowledge is not comprehensible to them. [Focus education on individual facts, not on relating all subjects to one another and combining them into an overall concept (the big picture); so only left brain hemisphere, educational opportunity linked to income so that the mob remains stupid, etc.]

8. Make the population think that they are average.
Achieve that citizens begin to believe that it is normal and timely to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated . [Reality shows, focus the masses on superficialities, propagate unattainable and false ideals]

9. Convert Resistance into
Guilty Conscience to Allow society to think that they are the only culprits of their failure because of insufficient intelligence, competence, or effort. The “system” thus counteracts a rebellion of the population by suggesting to the citizen that he is to blame for all evils and thus diminishes his self-esteem. This leads to depression and the blocking of further action. There is no revolution without action! [“I can’t do anything about it anyway, what’s the point of a person”]

10. Get to know people better than you do yourself
In the last 50 years, scientific progress has created a ravine between the knowledge that is available to the general public and that which is reserved for the narrow elite. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” achieved knowledge of human reality in the physical as well as psychological realm. At present, the “system” knows people, the individual citizen, better than they do themselves and thus has greater control over the individual. [Tavistock institute or the AK Rice Institute as ‘thought leaders’, other think tanks as ‘executors’ who refer to the respective areas of society]

With this knowledge and more, we are brainwashed day after day, created by scientists from the Tavistock Institute and its many offshoots around the world, in order to enslave ourselves as the ultimate goal, without our consciously realizing it. The world’s elite have the power and the money to affect our lives.

Tavistock net 2

Terror – Todays Mass-Mind-Control presented to you by Tavistock

It is more effective to steer society through mind control than through physical coercion. The events of September 11th and the “war on terror” are mostly mass brainwashing exercises.

The German psychiatrist Kurt Lewin developed the thinking behind September 11th. In the book “Mind Control World Control” (1997) Jim Keith writes:

“Lewin is credited with much of the original Tavistock research on mass brainwashing, which applies the results of repeated trauma and torture [of individuals] to control society at large.”

“If terror can be carried into a society on a broad basis, Lewin explained, then society returns to a tabula rasa, to an empty board, to a situation in which control can easily be introduced from an external point. “

In other words, by creating controlled chaos, the population can be brought to the point where they willingly submit to greater control. Lewin claimed that society must be brought into a state that corresponds to a “situation in early childhood”. He called this social chaos “fluidity”. ”(Page 44)

Elite planners designed 9/11 for its shock value. In the period that followed, they were able to force a security crackdown on a stunned population, an expensive military build-up and a war in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Keith quotes a Tavistock researcher Dr. William Sargent, author of “Battle for the Mind”: A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing “(1957):” Various types of beliefs can be implanted after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by … consciously induced fear, anger, or arousal. ” (48)

This draft was created long before September 11, 2001. The official story of this tragedy is not under scrutiny. There was no debris in the Pentagon. All three buildings were destroyed by explosives. Our “leaders” are accomplices in the murder of over 3,000 Americans and the destruction of an American icon. (more on that another time) The plan envisages transforming the USA into a “world government” controlled by central bankers based in London. Our cultural, economic and political elite are involved in the ongoing obfuscation.

Future Shock

Most political and cultural events are designed by the elite for their psychological impact. JFK could have been disposed of in a more humane way. (He had many health problems.) Instead, they shot him down because of his shock value, in the words of Mort Sahls, “like a dog on the street”. (there will be an article soon)

Jim Keith: “The Kennedy assassination was a British secret service, ie Tavistock hit, and its aim was to put the American consciousness in an almost comatose state in order to reprogram it, the usual Tavistock modus operandi.” p.143)

The same goes for the murders of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy. It all culminated in the beating of the protesters at the 1968 Chicago Democratic Congress. After that, my generation turned inward as we were programmed. “Turn on, tune in, drop out,” said CIA-funded pied piper Timothy Leary.
“[” I mean who should I work for, the KGB? “Joked Leary. (Keith p.99) Leary didn’t know that there wasn’t much of a difference.]

Many young people became “skulls” after Jerry Garcia’s Grateful Dead. Keith writes:

“An FBI internal memo from 1968 mentions the employment of the band ‘Grateful Dead’ as a means to steer youth dissent and rebellion in friendlier and non-threatening directions. They performed an important service by directing the focus of many young people towards drugs and mysticism and diverting them from politics. “(179)

Keith goes on to document CIA connections in creating mind control cults used to create “controlled chaos”. These include the Symbionesian Liberation Army, Jim Jones, Charles Manson, Scientology, the Unification Church, Son of Sam and Heaven’s Gate. The John Lennon assassination is also connected. (183)

To bring the picture up to date (around 2006), there are the murder of Princess Diana, Columbine, the blowing up of the levees in New Orleans, the burning of black churches and the avian flu. (After 2006, Sandy Hook, Nice, Paris, London, Toronto … the cases of false flag terrorism are too numerous to mention.) What we have is an ongoing secret war by central bankers against society, a bang psychological torture intended to unbalance or unsettle society.

Divide and Conquer – Choose your side

One of the tools constantly used in mainstream media is to frame a problem within a simple black and white polarity. The average mainstream reader does not know that the problem is actually being phrased in a very limited way – they believe that they are reading about a topic just as it is, backed up by facts. But often this is not the case and you have to take a closer look, let me explain this using the subject of gun control.

In Margaret Talbot’s New York article, the driving question is whether there will finally be tougher gun control legislation coming through Congress; presumably with the ultimate goal of disarming the entire civilian population. The polarity of the debate becomes clear this way: In one corner we have gun control advocates, those “sensible” people who obviously care for the nation’s children and mourn every time the news comes that one or more people are with a “senseless” (read: avoidable) school shooting were killed. In the other corner, we have gun ownership advocates, an eclectic collection of citizens who seem to think that their perceived right to own a gun is trumps the importance of the occasional unfortunate death of one or more of the nation’s children. Surveys and statistics are conveniently used to support this distinction. A 2017 Pew Research study is used to tell us that half of all gun owners say gun ownership is essential to their identity, “so we obviously come to the conclusion that gun owners have a lack of self-esteem.

And of course, no mainstream gun control debate article is complete without introducing a time-honored fairy tale about the NRA suspected of being the general voice of gun advocates (even if the article admits that most gun owners are not NRA members). The NRA and its powerful political lobby are portrayed as the only reason gun control legislation is so weak in the United States. And again, based on ‘scientific analysis’, the article claims to be able to objectively characterize the NRA (and thereby most of the gun ownership advocates) as an organization that is completely out of touch with reality, and say it all would to follow through on his agenda:

“The leaders and members of the organization used a remarkably consistent set of words to describe their identity: ‘law-abiding’, ‘peaceful’, ‘patriotic’, ‘freedom-loving’ and ‘average citizen’. Their opponents were ‘un-American’, ‘tyrannical’, ‘communist’ and ‘élitist’. “

The reality, however, is that the NRA has little or nothing to do with the gun control debate that is taking place in the hearts and minds of observant citizens. In fact, it’s not really a debate, as much as it is a possible conversation that gets too infrequent amid the distraction and fiery rhetoric promoted by the mainstream media. And the conversation revolves around this question: will the nation be better served when it has an armed citizenship?

Some may wonder what possible argument could be made for the benefits of armed citizenship. Well, the most obvious first step is to examine why the people of the United States were granted this right in the first place. There is an abundance of testimony from the Founding Fathers to suggest that the Second Amendment’s ‘right to bear arms’ is  based on the ability and will of citizens to preserve their freedoms and have ultimate control over the power of their government. This quote from Jefferson describes what is meant by this:

“What country can preserve its freedoms if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people are keeping the spirit of resistance? Let them take their arms. ” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

The founding fathers were aware of the fact that governments tend to become tools of outside power and, ultimately, tyranny. That is why they made a clear statement in the constitution that it is the right and duty of citizens to oppose any attempt by the government to restrict and control the freedom and self-determination that has been granted to the general public.

If we are to have a serious, balanced conversation about gun control, it will not result in words and pictures of shattered children recovering from horrific incidents – incidents which, incidentally, often contain remarkable inconsistencies, being carried out by the same hand was trying to advance disarmament. But that is the subject of an entirely different article. Suffice it to say that any serious conversation about gun control must include whether or not the citizens of the nation are dealing with a tyrannical authority. A survey of ardent gun owners would likely give the answer ‘yes’ more often than ‘no’.

This tactic is used all the time by the MSM, regardless of the topic, it is always presented as if there are only two perspectives on a topic and this forces you to choose one side and makes you blind to reality. Divide and conquer. They make us ask the wrong questions through suggestion: Are you conservative or liberal? Left or right? Against weapons or for amok? Trump or Hillary? Nationalist or ‘Refrugees Welcome’? Both sides feel right, but the reality is that both narratives are driven by the same source.

You’d think we’ve become more intelligent since the days when the peasants were ruled by the kings. But with intelligence, a decisive advantage of kings also comes to light: arrogance. Because anyone who no longer considers himself to be just a simple farmer who can neither read nor write as in previous centuries, but rather a fairly educated middle-class family man who likes to pause for a while when he opens the cultural section of a daily newspaper that is advertised as “renowned” faking his educational degree, he defends his worldview not only against the ruling class – in our case the government and the higher elites in finance and the military – but above all against the opposition and precisely those parts of the “mob”, which do not fully correspond to his opinion. With the intellectualization of the simple population emerging in the modern age, an unspeakable vanity emerges that prevents “left” and “right”, “liberal” and “statist” from uniting against the rulers in order to stand against the conscious of to fight against abuses of power such as surveillance, war and impoverishment committed by the elite.

In order to ensure that the population does not reconcile with each other even in the most criminal activities of the governments, elites and military of the western empire in order to take action against the rulers, the vanity of political “right” – “left” thinking, for example, must be exploited to share them.

In this way, people consciously speak in loud categories in public. From “socialists”, “social democrats”, “communists”, “liberals”, “conservatives”, “patriots”, “conspiracy theorists”, “chaots”, “radicals”, “philistines”, “experts”, “humanists”, ” Pragmatists ”,“ anti-Americans and “Putin understanders” are being discussed. The fact that most of them have one thing in common: namely the oppositional attitude towards the western empire is not mentioned.

The more small fragments we are divided into, the weaker we are. The more we focus our attention on the ‘being different’ of our fellow human beings, the less we recognize what we have in common. And while we are still busy discussing the latest election results and sending our outpouring of anger about the ‘shitty left’, ‘shitty right’, the ‘lazy Hartzer’ or ‘stupid conspiracy theorists’ into some data center, institutions like that Tavistock Institute or the CFR, everything continues as planned. Business as usual.

Through the separation, we also lose the feeling for what is actually important to us all: A completely freely determined life in harmony, without rulers and outside control. The separation and the chaos have taken most people’s imagination away that something like this is possible. Most of them have become so hopelessly dependent on being dominated that they would prefer their own slave existence to independence at any time. And that is by design. However, it is not impossible, we humans are incredibly powerful beings and compared to our rulers in gigantic numbers. As soon as we practice empathy, turn off the TV forever, stop buying newspapers,

share

The Bitter Truth

The most important thing in our life is that we are victims of elitist mind control. We have been trained to be apathetic, trivia-oriented, and selfish.

We derive our values, identity, meaning and love from our family roles. Women have been brainwashed to give up the female role and fight for the male role. A woman who devoted herself to the husband, the house, and the children was stigmatized. This is part of the elite long-term program to eradicate the institutions of marriage and the family.

After 90 years of research, Tavistock’s most important discovery concerns the sexuality of children. This has a great impact on personality development. Early sex stimulation creates adults whose emotional development is similar to that of a neurotic child. Your second discovery is related to stress. Tavistock researchers found that people under controlled stress became more childlike and gave up firmly held beliefs under peer pressure in order to conform to public opinion. This explains why the mass media insists so much on sex, violence, and fear-inducing messages. We become frightened, submissive children trying to escape the stresses of everyday life through emotional masturbation – television, radio, CDs, DVDs, movies, and video games.

Even at a young age, we are mainly fed by Disney (but also by others) with subliminal, especially sexual messages.

Disney 6
Disney 3
Disney 2
Disney

Disney 4

These pictures are all real, whoever has the films at home can check it out. This is also only a very small selection, there is a lot more, I will write a whole article about it. Subliminal messages work, they bypass the conscious mind and go straight into the subconscious. Not only Disney but also other advertisements / films, especially alcohol and tobacco advertisements, are full of subliminal sex or death symbols, as these appeal to our primordial instincts and make us easier to control. But as I said that would now go beyond the scope.

Westerners spend four + hours a day, the equivalent of two months a year or nine years in life, mesmerized by a television set, unaware of the impact that activity has on themselves. You almost stopped interacting with friends, neighbors, the community, and even family. She spends her free time in imaginary relationships with fictional characters on the screen.

Some US statistics will show us the extent of the phenomenon: 99% of households have at least one television set; there are 2.24 TVs per family; the TV stays on 7 hours a day; 66% eat in front of their TVs. The addiction starts right after birth, as 30% of children aged 0 to 1 year and 47% of 5 to 8 year olds have televisions in their rooms. A typical U.S. child spends 3.5 minutes a week in meaningful conversation with a parent, but 1680 minutes a week in front of the television. Is that why television is called a “one-eyed babysitter”? By the time they are 65 years old, most people have seen 2,000,000,000 TV commercials. This phenomenon is becoming more and more global.

The entire world population has become dependent on television. If you choose to give up the TV habit, you will experience psychological withdrawal symptoms that can be just as severe as those related to drug or alcohol abuse. There is a direct link between childhood obesity – which is severe for 11% of 6 to 17 year olds in the US – and advertising, as the most popular types of commercials involve junk food. One study counted more than 200 junk food ads during four hours of cartoons on Saturday morning television in the United States. Compared to listening to the radio, watching TV is more effective because there are pictures. The more there is to accompany a specific news report, the more tangible it will appear and the lower the chance that people question its accuracy. This is what media expert Hal Becker once said:

“I know the secret of getting the average American to believe anything I want them to. Just let me control the television…. You show something on TV and it becomes a reality. When the world outside of the TV contradicts the pictures, people try to change the world to match the pictures on TV. “

TV programation

How is it that the elite have been so successful in taking full control of television programming? With the support of the government. Politicians vote and pass laws that favor large TV networks over smaller ones and make it difficult for independent ideas to reach the airwaves. Better still, most countries have their own disinfected state television channels.

Tavistock hurried to study the effects of television on human behavior as early as the 1940s. The researchers discovered that 30 seconds after you start watching television, the brain automatically starts creating alpha waves, an altered state of consciousness. The viewer goes into a trance-like mode, a kind of light hypnosis. All your attention is focused on the screen while the rest of your surroundings are ignored. In this semi-conscious state, they become very vulnerable to the messages contained in the programs, especially the advertisements that are specially created for this purpose.

And have you ever noticed that for a few years now there has only been a countdown before every news broadcast, followed by round, swinging and rotating animations.

Is that familiar to you? This is exactly how a hypnotist puts his patient into a trance and opens his subconscious so that he becomes more susceptible to suggestions. Mass hypnosis! Probably also an achievement of the research of the Tavistock Institute. Be sure to watch this video, the animations start at 5:30, but it’s worth watching the whole video:


Television began to gain popularity in the 1950s and the elite have now accumulated more than 60 years of experience spread across three generations of viewers. The results are overwhelming. People are no longer logical because their opinions and ideas come straight from television. The pictures confirm what you hear. This filter of TV opinions is automatically placed over your daily reality and you have become passive members of a networked society and can no longer think, speak or write logically. For them, images and knowledge are synonymous.

In Europe, television violence is just as critical as it is in America. Specialized channels such as Baby TV and Baby First broadcast programs for babies around the clock. When toddlers are one year old, they watch TV for at least an hour a day. Statistics from 1988 showed that during a week of television viewers experienced 670 murders, 15 rapes, 848 fights, 419 gunshots or explosions, 11 armed robberies, 8 suicides, 32 hostage-taking, 27 scenes of torture, 9 defenestrations, 13 strangulations and 11 war scenes. Nowadays these types of events are no longer limited to the late hours. Quebec’s popular TQS broadcaster presented the film Terminator at 6:30 p.m. – just in time for children.
Incidentally, the Tavistock Institute was also heavily involved in the CIA’s mind control programs. Dr. William Sargent of the Tavistock Institute, reports that he was working there at the time of the CIA’s MKULTRA Mind Control Program, in his 1957 book, Battle for the Mind- A Physiology of Coversion and Brain-Washing, which was based on Lewin’s theories, he said:

“Various beliefs can be implanted in many people after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or consciously induced fear, anger, or arousal. Of the outcomes caused by such disorders, the most common are temporarily impaired judgment and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes summarized under the term “herd instinct” and occur most spectacularly in war, in severe epidemics and in all similar times of common danger, which increase fear and thus individual and mass suggestibility ”.

This works in individuals (called dream-based mind control), but also in large collectives. A nervous, scared or severely traumatized society is more willing to accept unpleasant changes without being asked. I will soon report in great detail on the CIA’s MK ULTRA program.

Attack on a counter-movement – from “conspiracy theorists” to “fake news”

Despite the recurring inconsistencies of many world events (especially armed conflicts) which run like a red thread through history and repeatedly lead to the same personalities, think tanks and organizations, the mere note of doubts about this leads to all media spread narrative, quickly to one sentence: You conspiracy theorist!

As soon as the stamp is on the forehead, the person has lost all credibility and is no longer listened to, and if so then only to make fun of them. The stamp is also often used to silence people. After all, conspiracy ‘theories’ only believe in uneducated idiots and you don’t want to belong to them, so you keep your mouth shut, even when questions come to mind that the media can’t explain.
And anyway, if there were, then it would be in the paper after all, you get to hear. If you don’t stop asking questions, you often get aggressive towards you, as you feel attacked as a person as soon as your beliefs with which you have identified yourself all your life start to shake.

It is purely human that deep-seated, trained convictions such as ‘the state only wants what is best for us’, ‘the media reports neutral’ or ‘we can change everything if we only choose the right party / president to power’ are difficult to give up and doubts about this one are very troubling. After all, a great deal in our social coexistence is based on these (mostly unconscious) convictions. Deceiving on such a fundamental level hurts and most people simply cannot / will not accept, even if the evidence was open to them.

Hello Mr.Anderson

agent smith
Agent Smith – Matrix

I like to call this the ‘Agent Smith’ effect, based on the very allegorical first Matrix film. The person you talked to carefree a few moments ago suddenly becomes completely different as soon as you mention certain trigger words or address topics. Just as the hypnotist can condition his patient to a certain trigger, society reacts automatically to certain words. Without being aware of it, he transforms himself into a metaphorical agent of the system who defends the system with all his might as if remotely controlled. People who are committed to the truth (like Neo) are brought back ‘on line’. Namely by self-copying Smith agents who protect their social programming and attack everything that runs to them again.

 Is such behavior controlled from outside?

As explained above, the Tavistock Institute (and others) has studied, manipulated and decisively changed the mindsets and behavior of entire societies over many decades. The possibilities of social engineering have also become much more precise and powerful since the mass use of the Internet (especially social networks). More on this later in Part 4.

However, through global networking, it has also become easier to share information that repeats the officially desired narrative. A new tactic was needed: How can the interpretative sovereignty be retained? How can the momentum of the countermovement, which points to the lies, be taken away? Can the counter-movement also be controlled? How can you prevent a chain reaction?

By proceeding as before: Psychological warfare.

Psy-Op Tactic # 1: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ – A CIA developed term

Conspiracy theorists. You hear this term everywhere now. So inflationary that it has already lost its real meaning. What many do not know, however, is that this term was introduced a long time ago by our suspects, the CIA, as a psychological weapon.

A leaked CIA memo from 1967 shows quite precisely how the CIA plans to use the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ to silence anyone who questions official government narratives. Especially the people who had (very legitimate doubts) about the murder of John F. Kennedy a few years earlier and who do not trust the Warren Commission in their investigation. Even then, 47% of the US population did not believe that Hervey Lee Oswald could have acted alone. The mistrust is no coincidence, the Kennedy assassination attempt is one of the most ridiculously obvious cover-ups in history, I will report on that in more detail in this article . In any case, the assassins had to … uh … I mean the CIA had to act and bring the public discourse back under their control.

To this end, they have developed several tactics which they reveal to their agents in this memo as a guide:

1. Politicians and journalists should push the official narrative (Mockingbird project, hello again)

2. the ‘conspiracy talk’ should largely be dismissed as ‘communist propaganda’ (does it sound familiar? No? Here are a few memories: ‘Putin’s internet trolls’ , ‘Russian fake news on election manipulation’ )

3. Critics should be warded off by claiming that they have political or financial interests, that they reach conclusions before there is evidence, or that their research is frantic or imprecise.

It should also be pointed out that conspiracies of this magnitude would not be possible because so many would have to keep their mouths shut. This argument (which, as we can see, was made public by the CIA) is often heard as an argument against the argument that conspiracies are impossible.

This is an incredibly weak argument that the US government has proven time and again that it is capable of keeping very large secrets secret for a very long time. For the Manhattan Project (the construction of the first atomic bomb), a completely new city was built in the middle of the desert in which thousands of scientists and military workers worked for years and whose existence was completely secret until it was dropped, not even the president at the time knew about it . Or the NSA, whose mere existence remained completely secret for 30 years despite thousands of employees, that of the NRO remained secret for 50 years. Until today there are big projects at any moment where a large group of people can successfully hide something for decades.

And besides ARE abound of people who talk that is often overlooked at such an assertion (if you know where to find them). However, so that this is not believed by the masses and they do not end up on the front pages, the CIA just introduced the smear campaign of the conspiracy theorist, as well as strategic placements in the media (Project Mockingbird contained, among other things, agents in the Washington Post, the NY Times, CNN, CBS and News Week). Now ask yourself why this document was not printed in any major newspaper.

As early as 1967, the CIA already proceeded in this way and if you go through press reports that were published at the time of the memo, you will see again and again phrases which were partly written word for word (!) After the suggestions of this memo. Of course, the NIST report on 9/11 immediately springs to mind, doesn’t it? There were bound to be guidelines there too. The CIA is doing the same today. Since then, the battle term ‘conspiracy theory’ has been used as a weapon of psychological warfare after every major world event.

Same in Germany. Since 2015/2016 in particular, we have been inundated by the media with this term and with defamation campaigns and Putin fake news blubber. Especially in comedy / cabaret / talk shows / films, the term conspiracy theorist is equated with clichés, mostly combined with a laughing soundtrack that is supposed to suggest the same reaction to the audience.
No question about it, a project like Mockingbird and the ‘Conspiracy Theory’ defense attacks of the CIA are still in action today, today more than ever.

Speaking of the CIA: Back in the 1960s, the CIA tested subliminal messages on the US population. Subliminal messages were added to the hymn, which was broadcast on television every day after the end of the broadcast, such as:

TRUST THE US GOVERMENT, GOD IS REAL GOD IS WATCHING, REBELLION WILL NOT BE TOLERATED, OBEY CONSUME, OBEY, CONSUME. MK ULTRA. MK NAOMI.

No joke. And that came late in the evening when most of the audience’s hearing is already in the alpha wave state. The well-behaved, patriotic post-war era gets a really creepy aftertaste. Check out this video, best at 0.25x speed.


Consumer corporations and Disney have also used subliminal messages for decades.

Psy-op tactic # 2: Fake news attack on a counter-movement

Fake news. This word was officially named Word of the Year 2017 by the Collins Dictionary. And not without reason, although it was first known through Trump, it can now be heard everywhere. The story of fake news on the Internet and the fall of the truth is told in a mantra-like manner by all the major newspaper houses. The truth, of course, has only been leased by the multimillion-dollar media groups. After all, they don’t have to lie, no hidden agendas, no commercial interests, no mistakes.

But the others: They only want book sales and clicks to generate as much money as possible, the others should be imprecise, and if they are not racists then at least spies paid by Russia who are supposed to confuse the unsuspecting population with their propaganda.

That is the narrative that has been repeated in the mass media for two years. Everyone is in agreement again, after all, the existence of all media houses is threatened, which are collapsing in circulation, ratings and page views. But threatened by whom? Who are the ‘others’?

The others are the so-called ‘alternative media’. Blogs, websites, video channels, podcasts, magazines, books, radio shows. Everyone who wants can contribute something and everyone who wants can consume them at any time and most of it is free of charge. They are represented in almost all media. So what makes it so ‘alternative’? It is their content that differs greatly from that of the large MSM. There is no distracting conversation and the messages are completely different and contain information that is either not shown at all, incoherently, or simply incorrectly shown in the MSM. The only thing that is so ‘alternative’ in the ‘alternative’ media is that they put things into the open light, which governments, secret services, military and powerful and influential families would rather keep in the dark. In short, if the Stannie Media did their job right, the Alternative Media wouldn’t exist. And without the global networking of the Internet, the secrets would also be easier to stay secret, because it is not so easy to buy influence there. Or when was the last time you saw an original CIA / FBI / NSA / DARPA / NASA document in the MSM?

The fake news narrative serves to calm down independent (ergo uncontrollable) news services, especially those who address the infiltration of the media. In the process, they become more and more shameless and, to be honest, more and more silly. The Washington Post was one of the first to push the unsubstantiated claims that all ‘alternative media’ were Russian propagandists. The whole thing was not substantiated, except by a website that could have been uploaded by anyone (not to mention the NSA). Massive Facebook pages that are run by ordinary people are being deleted. Everything is based on the Russia-hacking-our-democracy nonsense that has not been documented once to this day. However, repeating a lie thousands of times gives it an irresistible aura of credibility. Incidentally, this is a realization of theMK-Ultra programs of the CIA, also known as ‘psychic-driving’, it was found out that by playing the same information a thousand times over you can get a person to believe anything, especially if the person is in a deprived state (just like ours Society is kept in constant fear). The New York Times even received the Pulitzer Prize for its Russian hacking hoax, but as we know that is not necessarily a sign of creditworthiness (see TIME Magazine’s concentration camp story in the Bosnian war).

Wait a minute, I’m a Russian bot and just don’t know anything about it? 😛
Nothing has changed since then. Let’s see how many decades it will take this time until the ‘fake news’ memo comes to light.

How do we get out of there?

Our would-be Masters spend enormous amounts of money, time, and energy making sure that we who dare to question the status quo (the awakening ones) never reach our true potential. We go from the first phase of initiation, which often feels very painful and traumatic, to resting in a pasture that seemed greener from the other side, only to become powerless in the face of so much seemingly endless suffering. There are days when I look out into the world and wonder if I’m the only one who sees how broken things are and feels the pain of others as deeply as I do. But then I find that most of my companions are actually feeling the same deep pain and are just as unsure of what to do next as I am.

I don’t have all the answers, but I know we can’t stop now. I take it as a personal compliment to know that the control system relies on not doing as much as I can. And I think you who read these words should do that too.

So don’t stop in your quest for change, but remember that it starts from within. We cannot rest on phrases and feel good beliefs that are likely part of an agenda of manipulation.

I think the way to measure personal progress is to ask yourself – am I becoming kinder, more loving, and more honest with myself and others? If I have a choice to question my beliefs and reveal a greater truth, do I? And do I think for myself, develop personal judgment, critical thinking and inner knowledge of what the truth is so that I can change to embody it as much as possible?

I ask myself about these things regularly, and sometimes I am shocked at how far I have strayed from the path.

Let’s face it, our work as an awakening population is not easy. We need to heal ourselves and try to show others that they can do the same as we are attacked from all sides by a non-stop social tech attack and intimidation from those around us who just want us to drink Coke, a blanket Wrap around us with false satisfaction, sit back and watch the Earth-Ship sink under the waves of indifference.

But I know at the core of my being that at this moment of great change and apocalypse I did not come into this world to avoid the challenges of life. Like me, you may have come here to be the spiritual warrior and that means facing the greatest enemy – the enemy within. It is this traumatized, beaten and disempowered version of the self (the limited ego) that leads us to all sorts of distractions and does not allow us to strive for meaningful personal growth or change. But the purpose of our real life is so much more grandiose and heroic than this if we only dare to change the established habits of our time during our conscious hibernation.

We should all stop and think about what we believe. Because chances are that much of what we’ve identified with is part of an elaborate social engineering agenda that was developed before we were even a glimmer in our parents’ eyes.

What role do the new media, the Internet and, above all, social media and the affiliated companies in Silicon Valley play? Are you also doing social engineering with them? How did social media really come about? Are there information channels that run counter to the mainstream narrative and are they censored?


What's Your Reaction?

confused confused
0
confused
fail fail
2
fail
love love
2
love
lol lol
1
lol
omg omg
0
omg
win win
3
win